Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Figurative Language | 3 |
Sentences | 3 |
Syntax | 3 |
Language Processing | 2 |
Cues | 1 |
Discourse Analysis | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Form Classes (Languages) | 1 |
Interaction | 1 |
Natural Language Processing | 1 |
Pacing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom (Cambridge) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rohde, H.; Levy, R.; Kehler, A. – Cognition, 2011
We show that comprehenders' expectations about upcoming discourse coherence relations influence the resolution of local structural ambiguity. We employ cases in which two clauses share both a syntactic relationship and a discourse relationship, and hence in which syntactic and discourse processing might be expected to interact. An off-line…
Descriptors: Cues, Rhetoric, Form Classes (Languages), Figurative Language
Sturt, Patrick – Cognition, 2007
Participant's eye-movements were recorded while they read locally ambiguous sentences. Evidence for processing difficulty was found when the interpretation of the initially preferred misanalysis clashed with that of the globally correct analysis, demonstrating the persistence of the earlier interpretation. Processing difficulty associated with the…
Descriptors: Semantics, Persistence, Sentences, Language Processing
Grodner, D.; Gibson, E.; Watson, D. – Cognition, 2005
The present study compares the processing of unambiguous restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses (RCs) within both a null context and a supportive discourse using a self-paced reading methodology. Individuals read restrictive RCs more slowly than non-restrictive RCs in a null context, but processed restrictive RCs faster than…
Descriptors: Syntax, Interaction, Figurative Language, University Presses