Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Performance Factors | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Geometry | 1 |
| High Achievement | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Low Achievement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition and Instruction | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMagliano, Joseph P.; Millis, Keith K. – Cognition and Instruction, 2003
Two studies examined the viability of assessing reading strategies using a think-aloud protocol combined with latent semantic analysis (LSA). Findings demonstrated that the responses of less-skilled readers semantically overlapped more with focal sentences than with causal antecedent sentences, whereas skilled readers' responses overlapped with…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Performance Factors, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewedLawson, Michael J.; Chinnappan, Mohan – Cognition and Instruction, 1994
The problem-solving performance of high-achieving (HA) and low-achieving (LA) 11th-grade students was compared during solution of geometry problems using a think-aloud procedure. Detailed analysis of problem-solving protocols indicated that HA students not only accessed a greater body of geometrical knowledge but also used that knowledge more…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Geometry
