NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lu, Hongjing; Rojas, Randall R.; Beckers, Tom; Yuille, Alan L. – Cognitive Science, 2016
Two key research issues in the field of causal learning are how people acquire causal knowledge when observing data that are presented sequentially, and the level of abstraction at which learning takes place. Does sequential causal learning solely involve the acquisition of specific cause-effect links, or do learners also acquire knowledge about…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Causal Models, Sequential Learning, Abstract Reasoning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Michael D.; Vanpaemel, Wolf – Cognitive Science, 2008
This article demonstrates the potential of using hierarchical Bayesian methods to relate models and data in the cognitive sciences. This is done using a worked example that considers an existing model of category representation, the Varying Abstraction Model (VAM), which attempts to infer the representations people use from their behavior in…
Descriptors: Computation, Inferences, Cognitive Science, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koedinger, Kenneth R.; Alibali, Martha W.; Nathan, Mitchell J. – Cognitive Science, 2008
This article explores the complementary strengths and weaknesses of grounded and abstract representations in the domain of early algebra. Abstract representations, such as algebraic symbols, are concise and easy to manipulate but are distanced from any physical referents. Grounded representations, such as verbal descriptions of situations, are…
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Algebra, Problem Solving, Abstract Reasoning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Unsworth, Sara J.; Medin, Douglas L. – Cognitive Science, 2005
Norenzayan, Smith, Jun Kim, and Nisbett (2002) investigated cultural differences in the use of intuitive versus formal reasoning in 4 experiments. Our comment concerns the 4th experiment where Norenzayan et al. reported that, although there were no cultural differences in accuracy on abstract logical arguments, Koreans made more errors than U.S.…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Experiments, Cultural Differences, Persuasive Discourse