Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 4 |
Language Processing | 4 |
Syntax | 4 |
Sentences | 2 |
Ambiguity (Semantics) | 1 |
Experiments | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
French | 1 |
Information Retrieval | 1 |
Linguistic Theory | 1 |
Memory | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognitive Science | 4 |
Author
Badecker, William | 1 |
Clifton, Charles, Jr. | 1 |
Dillon, Brian | 1 |
Fedorenko, Evelina | 1 |
Lim, Eunice | 1 |
Linzen, Tal | 1 |
Mathy, Fabien | 1 |
Scheer, Tobias | 1 |
Scontras, Gregory | 1 |
Shank, Lisa | 1 |
Staub, Adrian | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Scheer, Tobias; Mathy, Fabien – Cognitive Science, 2021
The input to phonological reasoning are alternations, that is, variations in the pronunciation of related words, such as in "electri[k]" - "electri[s]-ity." But phonologists cannot agree what counts as a relevant alternation: the issue is highly contentious despite a research record of over 50 years. We believe that the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Phonology, Language Processing, Difficulty Level
van Schijndel, Marten; Linzen, Tal – Cognitive Science, 2021
The disambiguation of a syntactically ambiguous sentence in favor of a less preferred parse can lead to slower reading at the disambiguation point. This phenomenon, referred to as a garden-path effect, has motivated models in which readers initially maintain only a subset of the possible parses of the sentence, and subsequently require…
Descriptors: Syntax, Ambiguity (Semantics), Reading Processes, Linguistic Theory
Scontras, Gregory; Badecker, William; Shank, Lisa; Lim, Eunice; Fedorenko, Evelina – Cognitive Science, 2015
Syntactic complexity effects have been investigated extensively with respect to comprehension (e.g., Demberg & Keller, 2008; Gibson, 1998, 2000; Gordon et al., 2001, 2004; Grodner & Gibson, 2005; King & Just, 1991; Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; Lewis et al., 2006; McElree et al., 2003; Wanner & Maratsos, 1978). According to one…
Descriptors: Syntax, Difficulty Level, Sentences, Language Processing
Staub, Adrian; Dillon, Brian; Clifton, Charles, Jr. – Cognitive Science, 2017
Two experiments used eyetracking during reading to examine the processing of the matrix verb following object and subject relative clauses. The experiments show that the processing of the matrix verb following an object relative is indeed slowed compared to the processing of the same verb following a subject relative. However, this difficulty is…
Descriptors: Verbs, Reading Comprehension, Difficulty Level, Sentences