Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Prediction | 2 |
| Problem Solving | 2 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 2 |
Author
| Graham, Lauren K. | 1 |
| Hegarty, Mary | 1 |
| Kozhevnikov, Maria | 1 |
| Motes, Michael A. | 1 |
| Prat, Chantel S. | 1 |
| Stocco, Andrea | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Advanced Progressive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkStocco, Andrea; Prat, Chantel S.; Graham, Lauren K. – Cognitive Science, 2021
The ability to reason and problem-solve in novel situations, as measured by the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM), is highly predictive of both cognitive task performance and real-world outcomes. Here we provide evidence that RAPM performance depends on the ability to reallocate attention in response to self-generated feedback about…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Rewards, Abstract Reasoning, Problem Solving
Kozhevnikov, Maria; Motes, Michael A.; Hegarty, Mary – Cognitive Science, 2007
Three studies were conducted to examine the relation of spatial visualization to solving kinematics problems that involved either predicting the two-dimensional motion of an object, translating from one frame of reference to another, or interpreting kinematics graphs. In Study 1, 60 physics-naive students were administered kinematics problems and…
Descriptors: Visualization, Motion, Graphs, Eye Movements
