Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Advanced Placement Programs | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
High School Students | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
College Board | 4 |
Author
Engelhard, George, Jr. | 2 |
Kaliski, Pamela | 2 |
Braun, Henry | 1 |
France, Megan | 1 |
Huff, Kristen | 1 |
Manalo, Jonathan R. | 1 |
Morgan, Deanna | 1 |
Myford, Carol M. | 1 |
Paek, Pamela L. | 1 |
Plake, Barbara | 1 |
Ponte, Eva | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Non-Print Media | 2 |
Reference Materials - General | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Advanced Placement… | 2 |
National Merit Scholarship… | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kaliski, Pamela; Wind, Stefanie A.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Morgan, Deanna; Plake, Barbara; Reshetar, Rosemary – College Board, 2012
The Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) Model is traditionally used to evaluate the quality of ratings on constructed response assessments; however, it can also be used to evaluate the quality of judgments from panel-based standard setting procedures. The current study illustrates the use of the MFR Model by examining the quality of ratings obtained from a…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Item Response Theory, Models
Kaliski, Pamela; France, Megan; Huff, Kristen; Thurber, Allison – College Board, 2011
Developing a cognitive model of task performance is an important and often overlooked phase in assessment design; failing to establish such a model can threaten the validity of the inferences made from the scores produced by an assessment (e.g., Leighton, 2004). Conducting think aloud interviews (TAIs), where students think aloud while completing…
Descriptors: World History, Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Protocol Analysis
Paek, Pamela L.; Braun, Henry; Trapani, Catherine; Ponte, Eva; Powers, Don – College Board, 2008
This report analyzes the relationship of Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) teacher practices and student performance on AP Biology and AP U.S. History Exams. Using a national survey of AP teachers, the study developed four models for each subject with public school teachers only and both public and nonpublic school teachers, using two standards of…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Teaching Methods, Achievement Tests, Academic Achievement
Wolfe, Edward W.; Myford, Carol M.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Manalo, Jonathan R. – College Board, 2007
In this study, we investigated a variety of Reader effects that may influence the validity of ratings assigned to AP® English Literature and Composition essays. Specifically, we investigated whether Readers exhibit changes in their levels of severity and accuracy, and their use of individual scale categories over time. We refer to changes in these…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Essays, English Literature, Writing (Composition)