NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siegel, Muffy E. A. – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Discusses the results of a comparative study of the ways that newly recruited and very experienced composition teachers respond to students' papers, to determine what kind of special training, if any, would be most useful to new writing instructors. Results indicated that the differences between new and experienced teachers lay in the kinds of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sloan, Gary – College Composition and Communication, 1990
Compares writing errors made by college freshmen and professional writers. Explains that 20 student essays were compared to 20 essays from the students' textbook, "Short Takes: Model Essays for Composition." Notes that students and professionals were almost equally prone to commit errors. Offers suggestions for improving student writing.…
Descriptors: Authors, Comparative Analysis, Essays, Freshman Composition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newkirk, Thomas – College Composition and Communication, 1984
Describes the methodology and results of a study of the differences between instructors' evaluations of student papers and the evaluations of other students. The results indicated that instructors and college freshmen use different criteria and stances when judging student work. (HTH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McLeod, Susan; Horn, Heather; Haswell, Richard H. – College Composition and Communication, 2005
Assessment, including writing assessment, is a form of social action. Because standardized tests can be used to reify the social order, local assessments that take into account specific contexts are more likely to yield useful information about student writers. This essay describes one such study, a multiple-measure comparison of accelerated…
Descriptors: Acceleration (Education), Summer Programs, Writing Instruction, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bamberg, Betty – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Compares the efficacy of objective and holistic writing evaluation, in the context of the freshman writing program evaluation procedure at a west coast university. Indicates that holistic evaluation of writing samples is a far more accurate measure of writing quality and potential. (HTH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Essay Tests, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Viera, Carroll – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Presents results of a study indicating that evaluations of basic students' writing more closely resemble those of employers than those of English faculty. Suggests that English teachers redefine the basic writing student and the criteria used for evaluations. Includes samples of student essays evaluated in the study and evaluation results.(HTH)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Education Work Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Faigley, Lester – College Composition and Communication, 1989
Contrasts a recent collection of "best" student essays with a report reviewing a 1929 test in English that was used for making college admissions decisions. Concludes that writing teachers have been as much or more interested in who they want their students to be as in what they want their students to write. (RS)
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Comparative Analysis, Educational History, Essay Tests