Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attitudes | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Faculty Publishing | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Responsibility | 1 |
| Rhetoric | 1 |
| Writing (Composition) | 1 |
Source
| College Composition and… | 1 |
Author
| Jaclyn Wells | 1 |
| Lars Söderlund | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLars Söderlund; Jaclyn Wells – College Composition and Communication, 2019
This article presents findings of an interview study with twenty rhetoric and composition scholars. Findings focus on the responsibilities of reviewers, editors, and writers in scholarly peer review. The authors make several recommendations for improving peer review practices and call for a field-wide discussion of and research about the topic.
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Rhetoric, Writing (Composition), Editing
