Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Peer Evaluation | 2 |
Writing Assignments | 2 |
Aesthetics | 1 |
Authors | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Creative Writing | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Group Discussion | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Homosexuality | 1 |
Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
College Composition and… | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Timothy Oleksiak – College Composition and Communication, 2020
If, as I argue, student-to-student peer review is animated by "improvement imperatives" that make peer review a form of what Lauren Berlant calls "cruel optimism," then rhetoric and composition will need to imagine theories and structures for peer review that do not repeat cruel attachments. I offer slow peer review as a…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Writing (Composition), Writing Assignments
Kearns, Rosalie Morales – College Composition and Communication, 2009
Creative writing workshops typically feature a gag rule and emphasize purported flaws. This structure limits students' meaningful engagement with each other's work; positions the author as inherently flawed; and positions other participants as authority figures, passing judgment without articulating their aesthetic standards. I propose an…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Creative Writing, Writing Workshops, Writing Instruction