NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Krause, Steven D.; Rice, Jeff – College Composition and Communication, 2013
In this Symposium focused on MOOCs, this journal carries forward a tradition of attending to the technologies associated with composing and the teaching of composing. In the May 1983 issue of "College Composition and Communication," for example, most of the articles focus on composing and include a mix of inquiries, from Jack Selzer's on the…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Online Courses, Word Processing, Conferences (Gatherings)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Curtis, Marcia S. – College Composition and Communication, 1988
Examines research on using word processors for writing and writing instruction. Argues that research can mislead and discourage teachers from using computers in their classrooms. Asserts that word processing encourages students to have fun while guiding them through the revision process. (MM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Word Processing, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pufahl, John – College Composition and Communication, 1984
Discounts Collier's study of the effect of computer-based text editors on the quality of students' revision, arguing that editing is not an innate skill and that the computer predictably would not improve upon a process with which the students are not familiar. Collier replies that he excluded several methodological alternatives to reduce the…
Descriptors: Computers, Research Methodology, Research Problems, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daiute, Colette A. – College Composition and Communication, 1983
Discusses what computers (word processors) can do for the writer. Examines the physical and psychological constraints experienced by writers and explains how word processors can help in overcoming them. (FL)
Descriptors: Audiences, Cognitive Processes, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bean, John C. – College Composition and Communication, 1983
Describes an experiment at Montana State University in which 12 professors and four freshman composition students were trained to use the university's central computer as a word processor. Concludes that the computer can be a powerful revision aid for writing students. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computers, Higher Education, Program Content
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Case, Donald – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Based on interviews with university faculty, describes the impact of word processing upon their writing habits. (HOD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Higher Education, Influences, Professors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Catano, James V. – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Explains how a year of observing two successful novelists write and revise on the computer provided a number of ideas that are encapsulated in the concept of a fluid text or the writer's conscious avoidance of a text that becomes static or fixed. (HOD)
Descriptors: Authors, Behavior Patterns, Creativity, Editing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sudol, Ronald A. – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Suggests a computerized writing workshop provides an ideal setting for collaborative learning, enabling students to participate in activities such as peer evaluation and group brainstorming. (HOD)
Descriptors: Feedback, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rodrigues, Dawn – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Explains how students in a basic writing course gained confidence and independence as writers by producing and revising their texts on screen. (HOD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Computer Assisted Instruction, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Jeanette – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Reports on a small pilot study that investigated the effect of word processing on the revision of six college freshmen. The results suggested that word processing did not encourage students to revise more extensively. (HOD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Freshmen, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition)