NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anne Ruggles Gere; Anne Curzan; J. W. Hammond; Sarah Hughes; Ruth Li; Andrew Moos; Kendon Smith; Kathryn Van Zanen; Kelly L. Wheeler; Crystal J. Zanders – College Composition and Communication, 2021
Critical language awareness offers one approach to communal "justicing," an iterative and collective process that can address inequities in the disciplinary infrastructure of Writing Studies. We demonstrate justicing in the field's pasts, policies, and publications; offer a model of communal revision; and invite readers to become agents…
Descriptors: Metalinguistics, Writing Instruction, Writing (Composition), Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heller, Dana A. – College Composition and Communication, 1989
Suggests alternatives to marginal comments on students' papers as a way to encourage them to think more about the revision process. Recommends that teachers make no marks on the student's paper (only on a separate sheet), and ask leading questions in conference to guide the student to a focus. (RAE)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Higher Education, Teaching Methods, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McAlexander, Patricia J. – College Composition and Communication, 1988
Describes a procedure for keeping a running commentary on student writing. Claims cumulative comment sheets allow the teacher to get to know students more quickly, to recognize recurring error patterns, and to include genuine compliments, and help both student and teacher keep track of the student's progress. (SR)
Descriptors: College English, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cooper, Alan – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Provides a rationale for and description of daily student journal writing, peer evaluation, and revision, which provide students with necessary writing practice without overloading the instructor. (HTH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slattery, Patrick – College Composition and Communication, 1990
Describes a strategy designed to encourage critical thinking by assigning students to research and write about complex topics. Argues that the instructor's inclusion of both supporting and challenging end comments can encourage critical thinking. Provides examples of both types of comments. (SG)
Descriptors: College English, Critical Thinking, Higher Education, Research Papers (Students)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Straub, Richard – College Composition and Communication, 1996
Examines comments of three writing teachers to the same student paper to call into question the simplicity of labeling teacher comments as either facilitative or directive. Points to more directive ways to talk about teacher evaluations and marks. (TB)
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Teacher Role, Teacher Student Relationship, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
College Composition and Communication, 1987
Presents various teacher-tested instructional techniques: (l) using counselors to aid teachers in basic writing courses, (2) training writing teachers using the process method, (3) teaching proofreading skills (4) using imitation in literature classes (5) using lists and imaginary dialogue to supplement conventional journal writing assignments,…
Descriptors: Expository Writing, Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Literature
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beach, Richard – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Proposes a model for helping students assess writing during teacher student writing conference. Includes a guided form for assessing audience and intentions. (HTH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Models, Revision (Written Composition), Teacher Student Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCarthy, Patricia; And Others – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Suggests that in addition to self-evaluation of individual papers, assessment of one's overall ability to write effectively also plays an important role in the writing process. Includes the results of a study indicating a strong relationship between writers' evaluations of their own general writing skills and the quality of their written products.…
Descriptors: College English, Higher Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robertson, Michael – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Decries the narrow focus of teachers' comments on technique at the expense of content in students' essays. (HTH)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roth, Robert G. – College Composition and Communication, 1987
Discusses the possibility that a writer's audience may be more malleable than it is normally assumed to be and describes how one researcher worked with several advanced college writers to learn more about the dynamics of their composing processes. Suggests that the use of these writing strategies may benefit both teachers and students. (JD)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Higher Education, Learning Strategies, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
George, Diana – College Composition and Communication, 1984
Describes the characteristics and behavior of three kinds of peer groups in the composition classroom. Discusses some of the difficulties these groups encounter in their critiquing, and some suggestions for improving the dynamics of the less successful groups. (HTH)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
College Composition and Communication, 1981
Offers three techniques for helping students learn to revise entire pieces, discover how words work in context, and eliminate errors. (RL)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Class Activities, Classroom Techniques, College English