Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Classification | 2 |
Course Content | 2 |
Budgeting | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Course Descriptions | 1 |
Curriculum Design | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Educational Technology | 1 |
Graduate Study | 1 |
Grants | 1 |
Grantsmanship | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
College Teaching | 2 |
Author
Bonner, Dave | 1 |
Fallahi, Carolyn R. | 1 |
Ives, Bob | 1 |
Lalasz, Camille B. | 1 |
Levine, Laura E. | 1 |
Nicoll-Senft, Joan M. | 1 |
Springer, Victoria | 1 |
Tessier, Jack T. | 1 |
Walsh, Bridget A. | 1 |
Watson, Cheryl L. | 1 |
Wood, Rebecca M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Walsh, Bridget A.; Bonner, Dave; Springer, Victoria; Lalasz, Camille B.; Ives, Bob – College Teaching, 2013
Little information exists about the structure and content of grant writing courses offered in the United States. To fill this gap, we used multiple data sources, including a content analysis of syllabi from 93 graduate-level grant writing courses in the United States, and an online survey that sought insight into (a) the ways in which textbooks…
Descriptors: Grantsmanship, Proposal Writing, Course Content, Course Descriptions
Levine, Laura E.; Fallahi, Carolyn R.; Nicoll-Senft, Joan M.; Tessier, Jack T.; Watson, Cheryl L.; Wood, Rebecca M. – College Teaching, 2008
The purpose of this study was to use Fink's (2003) taxonomy of significant learning to redesign courses and assess student learning. Significant improvements were found across the semester for students in the six courses, but there were differences in which taxa showed improvement in each course. The meta-analysis showed significant, positive…
Descriptors: Learning Strategies, Classification, Educational Technology, Student Evaluation