Descriptor
Source
Communication Quarterly | 9 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Weider-Hatfield, Deborah; Hatfield, John D. – Communication Quarterly, 1984
Evaluation approaches to measuring reliabilty in interaction analysis by (1) presenting criteria for a sound reliability estimate, (2) evaluating currently used tests against these criteria, and (3) discussing application of appropriate tests to interaction data. (PD)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Evaluation Criteria, Interaction Process Analysis, Interrater Reliability

Glaser, Susan R.; Frank, David A. – Communication Quarterly, 1982
Demonstrates how rhetorical criticism can be utilized to clarify the rhetorical nature of interpersonal discourse. Synthesizes the following theories to explain the nature and form of selected portions of taped and transcribed interpersonal dialog: Lloyd Bitzer's situational theory, Ernest Bormann's fantasy theme analysis, and Carroll Arnold's…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Discourse Analysis, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Communication

Cline, Rebecca J. Welch – Communication Quarterly, 1990
Reconceptualizes groupthink symptoms as observable group interaction patterns. Proposes two coding systems for detecting the illusion of unanimity symptom, detecting both degree of unanimity and degree of the illusory versus substantive nature of that unanimity. (SR)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics

Brandt, David R.; And Others – Communication Quarterly, 1980
Results indicated that observers familiar with a communicator's truthful behavior were more accurate in detecting deception than those who were not familiar, and that accuracy increased as self-monitoring increased. (High self-monitors are individuals particularly sensitive to the expression and self-presentation of others in social situations.)…
Descriptors: Behavior, College Students, Communication Research, Comparative Analysis

Haas, Adelaide; Sherman, Mark A. – Communication Quarterly, 1982
Reports conversational topics among same-sex adult friends, co-workers, siblings, parents and children. Confirms findings of previous researchers but also reveals insights concerning same-sex conversational interactions, especially the sex differences in talk about sports. Includes the self-report questionnaire and tables of reported frequency of…
Descriptors: Adults, Communication Research, Females, Interaction Process Analysis

Goodall, H. Lloyd, Jr.; Phillips, Gerald M. – Communication Quarterly, 1981
Argues that studies on how and why humans talk, however precise the methodology, do not have the quality of science. Contends that these studies contain the essence of criticism and should be regarded as such. (PD)
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Communication Research, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education

Lustig, Myron W. – Communication Quarterly, 1980
Presents a computer analysis of talk-silence patterns of mixed sex triads related to levels of communication apprehension. Results indicate that high apprehensives talk less, talk less often, and are interrupted less often than low apprehensives. Discusses the implications of computer use in talk-silence behavior research. (JMF)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Communication Apprehension, Communication Research

Alderton, Steven M. – Communication Quarterly, 1982
Focuses on personality as a predispositional factor which is predictive of the direction of both persuasive argumentation by group members and, subsequently, decision shifting. Tends to validate the value theory of polarization by showing that persuasive argumentation can mediate the effect of personality on decisional shifting. (PD)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Discussion

Baker, Deborah C. – Communication Quarterly, 1990
Examines the relationship between verbal style and the early elimination of leaders in small groups. Finds that participants evaluated the authoritativeness and trustworthiness of other group members and that these evaluations depended upon the interaction of verbal style and content. (SR)
Descriptors: College Students, Communication Research, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics