NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Computer Assisted Language…29
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 29 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
W. A. Piyumi Udeshinee; Ola Knutsson; Sirkku Männikkö Barbutiu; Chitra Jayathilake – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
The discussion on the dynamic assessment (DA) -- a combination of assessment and instruction -- and regulatory scales from implicit to explicit corrective feedback (CF) is relatively new in the CALL context. Applying the notions of Sociocultural Theory, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and Mediation, the present study examines how a DA-based…
Descriptors: Synchronous Communication, Evaluation Methods, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kiliçkaya, Ferit – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Although a plethora of research has been conducted on written corrective feedback and timing of feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, there is a paucity of research on learners' preferences regarding different online written corrective feedback. Such a lacuna becomes prominent in EFL contexts, especially in grammar classes, where…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chao-Jung Ko – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
This study aimed to examine the impact of an online writing system (OWS) providing individualized corrective feedback (CF) on learners' self-correction of grammatical errors (GE). It consisted of two phases: the pilot and the formal phases. Four EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Taiwanese university students participated in the study at the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reynolds, Barry Lee; Kao, Chian-Wen – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2021
Feedback researchers have given little attention to how administration of language-focused instruction before writing in a second language combined with subsequent error correction after writing can affect the grammatical accuracy of learners' future writing. Moreover, the mode of the instruction (i.e., teacher instruction or game-based…
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, Direct Instruction, Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarré, Cédric; Grosbois, Muriel; Brudermann, Cédric – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2021
Corrective feedback (CF) can be provided to learners in different ways (explicit or implicit, focused or unfocused) and is the subject of major controversies in second language acquisition research. As no clear consensus has been reached so far about the most effective approach to CF with a view to fostering accuracy in second language (L2)…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Comparative Analysis, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bolgün, M. Ali; McCaw, Tatiana – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019
With the ever-increasing number of available language technology products, there is also a need to evaluate them objectively. Unsubstantiated beliefs about what language technology can and cannot do inside or outside the language classroom often influence decisions about the choice of language technology to be used. The declarative/procedural…
Descriptors: Neurosciences, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Metalinguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guo, Qian; Feng, Ruiling; Hua, Yuanfang – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
AWCF can facilitate academic writing development, especially for novice writers of English as a foreign language (EFL). Existing AWCF studies mainly focus on teacher and learner perceptions; fewer have investigated the error-correction effect of AWCF and factors related to the effect. Especially lacking is research on how successfully students can…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rassaei, Ehsan – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
The study reported here investigated the effects of recasts on L2 development in terms of promoting EFL learners' accuracy in using English articles during mobile-mediated audio and video interactions. Fifty-two Iranian EFL learners were randomly assigned into two audio and video recasts conditions as well as two audio and video control groups.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Video Technology, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawley, Jim – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2016
Research has shown that any assumption that L2 learners of English do well to rely on the feedback provided by generic spell checkers (for example, the MS Word spell checker) is misplaced. Efforts to develop spell checkers specifically for L2 learners have focused on training software to offer more appropriate suggestion lists for replacing…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Feedback (Response), Spelling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paul, Jing Z.; Friginal, Eric – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019
This study investigated the effects of Facebook and Twitter on foreign language (Chinese) learners' written production in both short- (10 days) and long-term (50 days) pseudo-experimental settings. Adopting two concepts (i.e. symmetric vs. asymmetric) from matrix theory in social network analysis, we categorized Facebook as a symmetric social…
Descriptors: Social Networks, Second Language Learning, Network Analysis, Sentences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ranalli, Jim – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2018
Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) has qualities that distinguish it from teacher-provided WCF and potentially undermine claims about its value for L2 student writers, including disparities in the amounts of useful information it provides across error types and the fact that inaccuracies in error-flagging must be anticipated. It remains…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Computer Assisted Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bodnar, Stephen; Cucchiarini, Catia; Penning de Vries, Bart; Strik, Helmer; van Hout, Roeland – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017
Although corrective feedback (CF) has received much interest in the second language acquisition literature, relatively little research has investigated the relationship between CF and learner affect in concrete practice situations. The present study investigates learners' affective states and practice behaviour in a novel context: oral grammar…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Yu-Fen – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2018
This study reports on how students construct new language knowledge by indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Indirect feedback (text organization, reader-based perspectives, and clarity of purpose) encourages students to negotiate meaning instead of merely copying peers' direct feedback on grammatical corrections. According to the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Collaborative Writing, Questionnaires, Language Proficiency
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crosthwaite, Peter – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017
An increasing number of studies have looked at the value of corpus-based data-driven learning (DDL) for second language (L2) written error correction, with generally positive results. However, a potential conundrum for language teachers involved in the process is how to provide feedback on students' written production for DDL. The study looks at…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Morphology (Languages), Syntax
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2