Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Computer Assisted Language… | 3 |
Author
An, Na | 1 |
Chen, Shen | 1 |
Chun, Dorothy | 1 |
Jiang, Yan | 1 |
Matthews, Joshua | 1 |
O'Toole, John Mitchell | 1 |
Wang, Jun | 1 |
Wright, Clare | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
China | 3 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jiang, Yan; Chun, Dorothy – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
This paper examines whether a web-based training on English discourse intonation leads to better spontaneous speech quality for Mandarin Chinese speakers who reside in the U.S. and in China. The four-week fully online training consisted of meta-instruction videos as well as listening and speaking activities, including instant visual pitch contour…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Wang, Jun; An, Na; Wright, Clare – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2018
Flipped instruction has become a hot issue in foreign language teaching technology. In this study, we tracked learners in a beginner-level Chinese Foreign Language classroom to see if flipped teaching based on a MOOC made a difference to their oral proficiency development and rate of progress compared to a baseline group. Language development was…
Descriptors: Second Language Instruction, Homework, Video Technology, Teaching Methods
Matthews, Joshua; O'Toole, John Mitchell; Chen, Shen – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017
This paper reports on task interaction, task success and word learning among second language (L2) learners of different levels of word recognition from speech (WRS) proficiency who used a CALL application previously shown to be effective in the development of L2 WRS. Participants (N = 65) were categorised into three levels of L2 WRS proficiency…
Descriptors: Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, Scores, Comparative Analysis