NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hao, Qiang; Smith, David H., IV; Ding, Lu; Ko, Amy; Ottaway, Camille; Wilson, Jack; Arakawa, Kai H.; Turcan, Alistair; Poehlman, Timothy; Greer, Tyler – Computer Science Education, 2022
Background and Context: automated feedback for programming assignments has great potential in promoting just-in-time learning, but there has been little work investigating the design of feedback in this context. Objective: to investigate the impacts of different designs of automated feedback on student learning at a fine-grained level, and how…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nutbrown, Stephen; Higgins, Colin – Computer Science Education, 2016
This article explores the suitability of static analysis techniques based on the abstract syntax tree (AST) for the automated assessment of early/mid degree level programming. Focus is on fairness, timeliness and consistency of grades and feedback. Following investigation into manual marking practises, including a survey of markers, the assessment…
Descriptors: Programming, Grading, Evaluation Methods, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sondergaard, Harald; Mulder, Raoul A. – Computer Science Education, 2012
We examine student peer review, with an emphasis on formative practice and collaborative learning, rather than peer grading. Opportunities to engage students in such formative peer assessment are growing, as a range of online tools become available to manage and simplify the process of administering student peer review. We consider whether…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Intellectual Disciplines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Titterton, Nathaniel; Lewis, Colleen M.; Clancy, Michael J. – Computer Science Education, 2010
Lab-centric instruction emphasizes supervised, hands-on activities by substituting lab for lecture time. It combines a multitude of pedagogical techniques into the format of an extended, structured closed lab. We discuss the range of benefits for students, including increased staff interaction, frequent and varied self-assessments, integrated…
Descriptors: Learning Activities, Computer Assisted Instruction, Mathematics Instruction, Lecture Method