NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 17 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Köymen, Bahar; Engelmann, Jan M. – Developmental Psychology, 2022
People rely on reputational information communicated via gossip when deciding about with whom to cooperate, whom to believe, and whom to trust. In two studies, we investigated whether 5- and 7-year-old children trust in gossip when determining a course of action. In Study 1, 5- and 7-year-old German-speaking peer dyads (N = 64 dyads, 32 female…
Descriptors: Young Children, Abstract Reasoning, Participative Decision Making, Trust (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shaqiri, Albulena; Pilz, Karin S.; Cretenoud, Aline F.; Neumann, Konrad; Clarke, Aaron; Kunchulia, Marina; Herzog, Michael H. – Developmental Psychology, 2019
The world's population is aging at an increasing rate. Even in the absence of neurodegenerative disorders, healthy aging affects perception and cognition. In the context of cognition, common factors are well established. Much less is known about common factors for vision. Here, we tested 92 healthy older and 104 healthy younger participants in 19…
Descriptors: Visual Acuity, Vision, Older Adults, Aging (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurst, Michelle A.; Cordes, Sara – Developmental Psychology, 2018
When proportional information is pit against whole number numerical information, children often attend to the whole number information at the expense of proportional information (e.g., indicating 4/9 is greater than 3/5 because 4 > 3). In the current study, we presented younger (3- to 4-year-olds) and older (5- to 6-year-olds) children a task…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Numeracy, Age Differences, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tucker-Drob, Elliot M. – Developmental Psychology, 2011
Normative adult age-related decrements are well documented for many diverse forms of effortful cognitive processing. However, it is currently unclear whether each of these decrements reflects a distinct and independent developmental phenomenon, or, in part, a more global phenomenon. A number of studies have recently been published that show…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Age Differences, Adults, Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keating, Daniel P.; Caramazza, Alfonso – Developmental Psychology, 1975
This study assessed the influence of age and ability on linear syllogistic reasoning in early adolescence by presenting bright and average 11- and 13-year-olds with 64, 3-term series problems. Results showed a dramatic effect on performance due to ability. Age effect was only marginally significant. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Deak, Gedeon O.; Ray, Shanna D.; Pick, Anne D. – Developmental Psychology, 2002
Three experiments tested 3- and 4-year-olds' use of abstract principles to classify and label objects by shape or function. Findings indicated that 4-year-olds readily adopted either rule when instructed to match objects by shape or function, but 3-year-olds followed only the shape rule. Without a rule, 4-year-olds tended to match by shape unless…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klaczynski, Paul A.; Narasimham, Gayathri – Developmental Psychology, 1998
Three experiments examined the role of representations in adolescents' deductive reasoning. Findings indicated that, with age, conditional reasoning improved on tasks containing permission conditional relations; reasoning fallacies increased on tasks containing causal conditional relations. Valid conditional inferences were more common on problems…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Adolescents, Age Differences, Deduction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavanaugh, Robert, D.; Harris, Paul L. – Developmental Psychology, 1994
Studied children's grasp of make-believe transformations they had seen enacted. Children indicated the pretend outcome by choosing a picture depicting no change or a picture depicting the pretend change. Older children chose correctly, even with the addition of a picture of an irrelevant transformation, but younger children did not. Autistic…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Autism, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Emmerich, Helen Jones – Developmental Psychology, 1979
Ratings of concreteness and picturability and production data for meaningfulness of 310 words were gathered from sixth-grade children and college students. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, College Students, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Longstreth, Langdon E.; Bailey, Darena A. – Developmental Psychology, 1977
Two studies with first- and fifth-grade children in two learning tasks showed that preoperational children did not necessarily learn responses followed by a stimulus object previously instrumental in obtaining a reward, while postoperational subjects did. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, James F.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1986
Second and third graders and fifth and sixth graders were tested in a very large, unfamiliar environment to determine the relation of their knowledge of an abstract reference frame to performance on a spatial inference task. (HOD)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wildman, Terry M.; Fletcher, Harold J. – Developmental Psychology, 1977
A 16-item conditional reasoning test was given to 281 students in grades 8, 10, 12, and 14. Developmental patterns of performance were examined. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, College Students, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Flavell, John H.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1978
A developmental study of elementary school children's use of rule v computation in solving spacial perspective-taking problems. (CM)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Child Development, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eisenberg-Berg, Nancy – Developmental Psychology, 1979
Examined the development of reasoning about prosocial moral dilemmas in 125 elementary and high school students. Also attempted to determine the relationship of structure of prosocial moral judgment to story solution. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greenberg, Mark T.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1977
A 5-trial social-conditional reasoning task was administered to 80 children between the ages of 3 and 6 years. The results indicated that by 4 years of age children are able to reason from a premise to its logical conclusion in reasoning about the probable behavior of others. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Early Childhood Education, Elementary School Students
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2