Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Discourse Processes: A… | 7 |
Author
Catrysse, Leen | 1 |
Chauliac, Margot | 1 |
Dandotkar, Srikanth | 1 |
Donche, Vincent | 1 |
Freed, Erin M. | 1 |
Gijbels, David | 1 |
Hamilton, Stephen T. | 1 |
Lea, R. Brooke | 1 |
Lewis, Mark Rose | 1 |
Long, Debra L. | 1 |
Magliano, Joseph P. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Canada (Edmonton) | 1 |
New York (Albany) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Nelson Denny Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Smith, Emily R.; Lea, R. Brooke; O'Brien, Edward J. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2023
The current set of experiments was designed to explore the processing of spatial information during reading, specifically the "spatial-shift" effect and the "spatial-gradient" effect. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that when participants were presented with text alone (i.e., without prior map memorization, virtual…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Memory, Reading Processes, Undergraduate Students
Catrysse, Leen; Chauliac, Margot; Donche, Vincent; Gijbels, David – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
This study examined the relationship between refutation texts and attention allocation by focusing on the interaction between important reader-and-text characteristics. Specifically, the authors investigated how prior knowledge and text-based interest affect attention allocation on refutation/control statements, topic, and explanatory and…
Descriptors: Correlation, Attention Control, Reading Materials, Reader Text Relationship
Peter Dixon; Marisa Bortolussi – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2019
We argue that to understand how readers process narrative, it is necessary to distinguish between psychological stance (i.e., how the narrator evaluates events and characters) and physical perspective (i.e., the angle of view from which events are described). Although these are metaphorically related, the cognitive processes that produce such a…
Descriptors: Perspective Taking, Literary Genres, Perception, Reader Text Relationship
Hamilton, Stephen T.; Freed, Erin M.; Long, Debra L. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
The goal of this study was to examine predictions derived from the Lexical Quality Hypothesis regarding relations among word decoding, working-memory capacity, and the ability to integrate new concepts into a developing discourse representation. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to quantify the effects of three text properties (length,…
Descriptors: Reading Ability, Decoding (Reading), Reading Comprehension, Reader Text Relationship
Lewis, Mark Rose; Mensink, Michael C. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Prereading questions can be an effective tool for directing students' learning. However, it is not always clear what the online effects of a set of prereading questions will be. In two experiments, this study investigated whether readers direct additional attention to and learn more from sentences that are potentially relevant to a set of…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Attention Control, Educational Indicators, Reader Text Relationship
McCrudden, Matthew T.; Magliano, Joseph P.; Schraw, Gregory – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
This work examined how adjunct displays influence college readers' moment-by-moment processing of text and the products of reading, using reading time (Experiments 1 & 2), and think-aloud methodologies (Experiment 3). Participants did or did not study a diagram before reading a text. Overall, the reading time data, think-aloud data, and recall…
Descriptors: Electronic Publishing, Reading Processes, Reader Text Relationship, College Students
Todaro, Stacey; Millis, Keith; Dandotkar, Srikanth – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Readers apply their own standards of coherence while reading text. Readers with a low standard of coherence are thought to find a sparse and incomplete representation more coherent than readers who employ a higher standard. This article reports 3 experiments that examined standards of coherence imposed by skilled and less-skilled readers by having…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Skills, Reader Text Relationship, Sentences