Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Cognitive Processes | 3 |
Humor | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Congruence (Psychology) | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Context Effect | 1 |
Emotional Response | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Influences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Discourse Processes: A… | 3 |
Author
Bianchi, Ivana | 1 |
Canestrari, Carla | 1 |
Christian Burgers | 1 |
Ellen Droog | 1 |
Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
Louwerse, Max M. | 1 |
Mitchell, Heather H. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ellen Droog; Christian Burgers – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Research into the persuasiveness of satirical news has found mixed results. Two possible explanations lie in the lack of clarity about mechanisms underlying the influence of consuming different types of satirical content. In six experiments (N[subscript total] = 3,139), we investigated how (different types of) humorous versus nonhumorous…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, News Reporting, Satire, Humor
Canestrari, Carla; Bianchi, Ivana – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
According to the cognitive approach to humor, the comprehension of humorous texts implies recognizing an incongruity and resolving it. This article studies whether the cognitive process involved in the recognition of incongruity is affected by the conditions that make contrariety evident or only analytically recognizable in the perceptual domain.…
Descriptors: Humor, Cognitive Processes, Recognition (Psychology), Stimuli
Mitchell, Heather H.; Graesser, Arthur C.; Louwerse, Max M. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of various constraints on the processing of jokes. Participants read humorous jokes and nonhumorous alternatives of the jokes, which were presented in 3 conditions that manipulated discourse context (comedy, political, and control). In Experiment 1, participants rated the funniness of texts and…
Descriptors: Context Effect, Eye Movements, Humor, Cognitive Processes