Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Discourse Processes: A… | 3 |
Author
Crible, Ludivine | 1 |
Gill, Alastair J. | 1 |
Kovaz, David | 1 |
Kreuz, Roger J. | 1 |
Oberlander, Jon | 1 |
Riordan, Monica A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Crible, Ludivine – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2020
Ambiguity in discourse is pervasive, yet mechanisms of production and processing suggest that it tends to be compensated in context. The present study sets out to analyze the combination of discourse markers (such as "but" or "moreover") with other discourse signals (such as semantic relations or punctuation marks) across three…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Language Styles, Ambiguity (Semantics), Language Processing
Kovaz, David; Kreuz, Roger J.; Riordan, Monica A. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Sarcasm production and comprehension have been traditionally described in terms of pragmatic factors. Lexical cues have received less attention, but they may be important potential indicators. A major obstacle to examining such features is determining sarcastic intent. One solution is to analyze statements explicitly marked as being sarcastic.…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Electronic Publishing, Phrase Structure, Negative Attitudes
Oberlander, Jon; Gill, Alastair J. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
To what extent does the wording and syntactic form of people's writing reflect their personalities? Using a bottom-up stratified corpus comparison, rather than the top-down content analysis techniques that have been used before, we examine a corpus of e-mail messages elicited from individuals of known personality, as measured by the Eysenck…
Descriptors: Personality, Computational Linguistics, Content Analysis, Individual Differences