NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guan, Shuang; Arnold, Jennifer E. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
In discourses involving implicit causality, the implicit cause of the event is referentially predictable, that is, it is likely to be rementioned. However, it is unclear how referential predictability is calculated. We test two possible explanations: (1) The frequency account suggests that people learn that implicit causes are predictable through…
Descriptors: Influences, Prediction, Incidence, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skalicky, Stephen – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Informed by a theoretical model of satirical uptake, this study investigated processing behavior and comprehension of satirical news articles. Reading times for segments of minimally different satirical and non-satirical texts were collected using within-subjects (Experiment 1) and between-subjects (Experiment 2) designs. Segment reading times and…
Descriptors: Satire, Language Processing, Reading Rate, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zarcone, Alessandra; Demberg, Vera – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
There is now a well-established literature showing that people anticipate upcoming concepts and words during language processing. Commonsense knowledge about typical event sequences and verbal selectional preferences can contribute to anticipating what will be mentioned next. We here investigate how temporal discourse connectives…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Discourse Analysis, Form Classes (Languages), Word Order
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trott, Sean; Bergen, Benjamin – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2019
People often speak ambiguously, as in the case of "indirect requests." Certain indirect requests are conventional and thus straightforward to interpret, such as "Can you turn on the heater?", but others require substantial additional inference, such as "It's cold in here." How do comprehenders make inferences about a…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Speech Acts, Discourse Analysis, Intention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braasch, Jason L. G.; Kessler, Erica D. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
Comprehension substantially benefits from attending to, thinking about, and mentally representing the sources of any presented information. Such processes require mental effort and unfortunately people do not always engage in such activities. The current article presents a nascent, evolving model of discourse comprehension that formalizes…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Discourse Analysis, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Navarro, Ester; Macnamara, Brooke N.; Glucksberg, Sam; Conway, Andrew R. A. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2020
The underlying cognitive mechanisms explaining why speakers sometimes make communication errors are not well understood. Some scholars have theorized that audience design engages automatic processes when a listener is present; others argue that it relies on effortful resources, even if a listener is present. We hypothesized that working memory is…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Short Term Memory, Individual Differences, Error Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heruti, Vered; Bergerbest, Dafna; Giora, Rachel – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2019
In two experiments this study tested the "Graded Salience Hypothesis" and the "Defaultness Hypothesis." It weighs the effects of linguistic versus pictorial contexts in terms of activation (or suppression) of default, salient meanings when context invites nondefault, less-salient alternatives. Using a naming task, Experiments 1…
Descriptors: Prediction, Pictorial Stimuli, Task Analysis, Naming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dopkins, Stephen; Nordlie, Johanna – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Recognition judgments to the non-antecedents of a repeated-noun anaphor are slower and less accurate after than before the processing of the anaphor. Disagreement exists as to whether this pattern of performance reflects a bias shift carried out by a memory process associated with the recognition of a word that has previously occurred in the…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Nouns, Comprehension, Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Otten, Marte; Van Berkum, Jos J. A. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
Language is an intrinsically open-ended system. This fact has led to the widely shared assumption that readers and listeners do not predict upcoming words, at least not in a way that goes beyond simple priming between words. Recent evidence, however, suggests that readers and listeners do anticipate upcoming words "on the fly" as a text…
Descriptors: Prediction, Language Processing, Priming, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Mina; Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly; Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
The Landscape Model of text comprehension was extended to the comprehension of audiovisual discourse from text and video TV news stories. Concepts from the story were coded for activation after each sequence, creating a matrix of activations that was reduced to a vector of the degree of total activation for each concept. In Study 1, the degree…
Descriptors: Television Viewing, Television, Correlation, Models