NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bar-Lev, Zev – Discourse Processes, 1986
Appraises R. Kaplan's "contrastic rhetoric" in the light of a multilanguage research project on discourse structure. Concludes that Kaplan's specific analyses are in need of substantive revision. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, English, Language Variation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Prinz, Philip M.; Prinz, Elisabeth A. – Discourse Processes, 1985
Describes discourse development in the sign language of 24 profoundly deaf children. Findings indicate children were acquiring appropriate discourse strategies comparable to those used by hearing children in spoken conversations and adult deaf signers. (DF)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Deafness, Discourse Analysis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pu, Ming-Ming – Discourse Processes, 1995
Focuses on the way entities are introduced into discourse, how they are referred to again later, and what motivates speakers to choose particular anaphora to manage reference at a given point in a narrative. Compares anaphoric patterns in English and Mandarin narratives. (HB)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shanon, Benny – Discourse Processes, 1983
Three experiments conducted with normal adults in both Israel and the United States show that the answers people give to questions vary with the category of the target and its distance. (FL)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Black, Steven D.; And Others – Discourse Processes, 1983
Compares discourse in several different media and finds that strict sequentiality is not a universal feature of discourse. Concludes that discourse in nonreal time media, such as electronic message systems, has multiple threads. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cicourel, Aaron V. – Discourse Processes, 1980
Argues that the study of discourse and the larger context of social interaction requires explicit reference to a broader organizational setting and aspects of cultural beliefs often ignored by students of discourse, conversational analysis, and paralinguistic and nonverbal activities. (FL)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Longacre, Robert E. – Discourse Processes, 1989
Uses eight languages in five distinct linguistic areas to examine two hypotheses regarding text generation and analysis and to illustrate their reciprocity relative to narrative discourse. Demonstrates how these hypotheses yield salience schemes and constituent analysis which mutually corroborate and correct each other. (KEH)
Descriptors: American Indian Languages, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Discourse Modes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hidi, Suzanne E.; Hilyard, Angela – Discourse Processes, 1983
Concludes that children's discourse production is organized according to a schema that is discourse specific but modality general. (FL)
Descriptors: Child Language, Cohesion (Written Composition), Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Au, Kathryn Hu-Pei; Mason, Jane M. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Compares interactional rules in the lessons of a teacher who taught in a culturally congruent way and one who did not. Concludes that control over topic of discussion was maintained only by the teacher who used culturally congruent interactional patterns, and that the lessons of the other teacher were frequently sidetracked because of conflicts…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Classroom Techniques, Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baggett, Patricia; Ehrenfeucht, Andrzej – Discourse Processes, 1982
Concludes that junior high school students encode movies better than prose, but that college students encode both equally well. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Error Patterns