Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
Source
| Education Next | 18 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 18 |
| Opinion Papers | 8 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 6 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 8 |
| Race to the Top | 3 |
| Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
| Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 2 |
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Russo, Alexander – Education Next, 2015
The media and observers across the ideological spectrum were surprised and, in some cases, disconcerted in July 2014, when at the annual American Federation of Teachers (AFT) convention in Los Angeles, the union's leadership team announced that its Innovation Fund grants of $20,000 to $30,000 were going to be made available to state and local…
Descriptors: Unions, State Standards, Academic Standards, Teacher Attitudes
Jochim, Ashley; McGuinn, Patrick – Education Next, 2016
This article reports on why states are quitting the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC). The two consortia sought to develop state-of-the-art assessments that focused on problem solving and the application of knowledge, and that moved away from former tests'…
Descriptors: Politics of Education, Common Core State Standards, Consortia, Resistance (Psychology)
Polikoff, Morgan S.; Petrilli, Michael J.; Loveless, Tom – Education Next, 2020
The Common Core State Standards, released in 2010, were rapidly adopted by more than 40 states. Champions maintained that these rigorous standards would transform American education, but the initiative went on to encounter a bumpy path. A decade on, what are we to make of this ambitious effort? What kind of impact, if any, has it had on the…
Descriptors: Common Core State Standards, National Standards, Elementary Secondary Education, Public Schools
Lastra-Anadon, Carlos Xabel; Peterson, Paul E. – Education Next, 2012
Undoubtedly, the United States has much to learn from education systems in other countries. Once the world's education leader, the U.S. has seen the percentage of its high-school students who are proficient trail that of 31 other countries in math and 16 countries in reading, according to a recent study by Harvard's Program on Education Policy and…
Descriptors: School Choice, Educational Change, Accountability, Educational Policy
Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Kahlenberg, Richard D.; Kress, Sandy – Education Next, 2015
As states move to implement the Common Core State Standards, key challenges remain. One is how to make sure a high school diploma acknowledges what students have achieved. Should states adopt a two tiered diploma, in which students who pass internationally aligned Common Core exams at a career- and college-ready level receive an…
Descriptors: State Standards, Graduation Requirements, High School Graduates, High School Equivalency Programs
Starr, Joshua P.; Spellings, Margaret – Education Next, 2014
More than 40 states plan to assess student performance with new tests tied to the Common Core State Standards. In summer 2013, results from Common Core-aligned tests in New York showed a steep decline in outcomes. Common Core advocates hailed the scores as an honest accounting of school and student performance, while others worried that they…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, State Standards, Academic Standards, Scores
Henderson, Michael B.; Howell, William G.; Peterson, Paul E. – Education Next, 2014
The Common Core State Standards initiative (CCSS) seeks to "provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn" at various grade levels. For some education observers, CCSS will finally clarify for students, parents, and educators what students need to know and be able to do if they are to be prepared for…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Educational Change, State Standards, Academic Standards
McShane, Michael Q. – Education Next, 2014
This article presents a debate over the Common Core State Standards Initiative as it has rocketed to the forefront of education policy discussions around the country. The author contends that there is value in having clear cross state standards that will clarify the new online and blended learning that the growing use of technology has provided…
Descriptors: State Standards, Academic Standards, Educational Policy, Electronic Learning
Schneider, Mark – Education Next, 2009
Recent months have brought an ever-louder drumbeat in support of state-level participation in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), with a weaker chorus calling for states to participate in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Despite the growing infatuation with international comparisons of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Education, Comparative Testing, Participation
Peer reviewedWalberg, Herbert J. – Education Next, 2003
Traces the development of accountability movement since publication of "A Nation at Risk." Suggests that accountability has failed to improve public education because standards underlying accountability adopted by most states are too weak to be effective. Describes framework for effective standards. Lauds accountability requirements in…
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, State Standards
Springer, Matthew G. – Education Next, 2008
Increasingly frequent journalistic accounts report that schools are responding to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) by engaging in what has come to be known as "educational triage." Although these accounts rely almost entirely on anecdotal evidence, the prospect is of real concern. The NCLB accountability system divides schools into those in…
Descriptors: Educational Needs, Equal Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Educational Improvement
Peterson, Paul E.; Hess, Frederick M. – Education Next, 2006
While No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires all students to be "proficient" in math and reading by 2014, the precedent-setting 2002 federal law also allows each state to determine its own level of proficiency. It's an odd discordance at best. It has led to the bizarre situation in which some states achieve handsome proficiency results by…
Descriptors: State Standards, State Officials, Federal Legislation, Accountability
Peer reviewedHeise, Michael – Education Next, 2002
Discusses how advocacy groups use standards movement to obtain more school spending from state legislatures through the courts. Describes New York and North Carolina cases wherein plaintiffs used states' standards and performance expectations as evidence of the states' failure to provide an adequate education for all students, especially poor and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Court Litigation, Educational Equity (Finance), Educational Finance
Jacob, Brian; Lefgren, Lars – Education Next, 2007
Recent government education policies seem to assume that academic achievement as measured by test scores is the primary objective of public education. A prime example is the federal No Child Left Behind law, which requires schools to bring all of their students to "proficient" levels on math and reading tests by 2014. Many state…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Elementary School Students, Public Education, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewedBishop, John H. – Education Next, 2004
Highlights a promising innovation, Michigan's college scholarship program for students who perform well on state tests. The scholarships are based on students' performance on an external exam that reflects the state's recommended curriculum. Georgia also has the merit-based Hope scholarship program. (MLF)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Exit Examinations, High Schools
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
