Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Education Week | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olson, Lynn – Education Week, 2005
Twenty-three states are expanding their testing programs to additional grades this school year to comply with the federal No Child Left Behind Act. In devising the new tests, most states have defied predictions and chosen to go beyond multiple-choice items, by including questions that ask students to construct their own responses. But many state…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Federal Legislation, Measurement, Multiple Choice Tests
Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy – Education Week, 2007
This article reports that national tests in several core subjects could be eliminated or scaled back over the next five years without more federal funding. The officials who set policy for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) say scheduled exams in economics, foreign language, geography, and world history could be canceled if…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Federal Legislation, Testing, National Competency Tests
Olson, Lynn – Education Week, 2006
The U.S. Department of Education has notified 10 states that it intends to withhold a portion of their state administrative funds under the Title I program for failing to comply fully with the testing provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act by the end of the 2005-06 school year. Those funds would instead be diverted directly to school…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Federal Legislation, Testing Programs, Educational Finance
Robelen, Erik W. – Education Week, 2004
Under the federal law, students at all public schools are expected to become "proficient"--as defined by each state--by the end of 2013-14 school year. The law requires steady academic progress overall and by subgroups of students, such as poor and minority youngsters. The law dishes out increasingly tough consequences for Title I schools that…
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement

Direct link
