NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackson, Hal G.; Neel, Richard S. – Education and Treatment of Children, 2006
This descriptive observation study examined the degree to which students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) have access to National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards-based curricula and instruction. Investigators completed 60 observations, using a partial interval time-sampling procedure, in 12 elementary general…
Descriptors: General Education, Federal Legislation, Mathematics Teachers, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Drasgow, Erik; Yell, Mitchell L.; Bradley, Renee; Shriner, James G. – Education and Treatment of Children, 1999
This article presents Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requirements on functional behavioral assessments (FBAs), describes the process of conducting an FBA, explains the legal requirements for developing measurable goals and benchmarks or short-term objectives, describes the development of a behavior intervention plan, and presents a…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Compliance (Legal), Educational Legislation, Educational Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Neel, Richard S. – Education and Treatment of Children, 2006
No Child Left Behind offers many challenges to those who work with children with EBD [emotional and behavioral disorders]. It also offers opportunities never before available for collaboration and cooperation between general and special educators. Two snapshots of opportunities are provided. The first summarizes some of the challenges our field…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Computer Simulation, Therapy, Behavior Disorders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McAfee, James K.; Schwilk, Christopher; Mitruski, Megan – Education and Treatment of Children, 2006
The US Constitution, federal and state legislatures, courts, and regulations permit physical restraint for both therapeutic (i.e., behavior change) and risk prevention purposes. Although most venues limit restraint as punishment, no government entity prohibits use of physical restraint as a response to imminent danger. This paper provides a…
Descriptors: Public Policy, Behavior Modification, Disabilities, Discipline