Descriptor
Source
Educational Evaluation and… | 11 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Historical Materials | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
Education Consolidation… | 1 |
Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
Hawkins Stafford Act 1988 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

VanderPloeg, Arie J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
A brief history of Title I evaluation efforts in Chicago illustrates the concern that the evaluation of Title I programs must serve two masters: the federal reporting mandate and local needs. (PN)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Educational Legislation, Evaluation Utilization

Seidman, William H. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
This article examines some of the reasons attempts to tighten the couplings between legislative and judicial intent and site level implementation have remained problematic. Specifically, this article argues that the assumption that program evaluation can force program implementation is faulty. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Educational Change, Federal Legislation, Models

Mertens, Donna M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1984
This study traces the rationale for the sex equity provisions of the 1976 Vocational Education Act Amendments. Effects on personnel roles and responsibilities, fund expenditures, and enrollment trends are examined. Economic consequences of participation in vocational education are discussed from the perspective of sex equity. (BS)
Descriptors: Enrollment Trends, Federal Legislation, Females, Postsecondary Education

Borman, Geoffrey D.; D'Agostino, Jerome V. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1996
Meta-analytic techniques were used to study the overall impact of the Title I program on student achievement and to examine the effects of mediating methodological and programmatic factors. Data from 17 Federal studies with 657 effect sizes indicate a modest impact of Title I that increased as the program matured. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Educational Improvement, Effect Size

Altschuld, J. W.; Downhower, S. G. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act mandates a free and appropriate education for all handicapped children between the ages of 3-18 (to be extended to 3-21 by 1981). The premises upon which the act was formulated as well as its provisions are described. (RL)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education

Cross, Christopher T. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Review of congressional hearings leading to the enactment of the Education Amendments of 1974 (Public Law 93-380), the initial response of the United States Office of Education, and the study conducted by the National Institute of Education as mandated in Section 821 of PL 93-380. (MH)
Descriptors: Accountability, Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Educational Objectives

Jaeger, Richard M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
A liberal interpretation of Section 151 of Public Law 93-380, to implement effective local evaluation of Title I programs, is supported. Weaknesses are cited: (1) nationwide impact data, (2) unsound aggregation of Title I achievement gains, and (3) lack of consideration of alternative evaluation methods. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods

Florio, David H.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Twenty-six congressional staff members dealing with educational legislation were surveyed concerning their sources of information and the relative importance and value of educational inquiry in various stages of the policy process. Conclusions were drawn and recommendations regarding improvement of the process were made. (MH)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrators, Decision Making, Educational Policy

Barnes, Robert E.; Ginsburg, Alan L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The RMC models for Title I program evaluations involve too large an expenditure of effort in relation to the information needs of the federal government. Too little is being done to ensure the usefulness of the models at state and local levels. (MH)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Economically Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

Wisler, Carl E.; Anderson, Janice K. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Seven considerations in designing the Title I Evaluation and Reporting System are reviewed: satisfying state, local, and federal needs; summative evaluation; differences in Title I subprograms; local use of different achievement tests; comparative analysis data; use of approved evaluation designs; and use of a common reporting metric. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

C de Baca, Mary Rose; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991
The schoolwide project option of the 1988 Hawkins Stafford Amendments to Chapter 1 allowed a rural school serving a disadvantaged Native American population to restructure its compensatory and regular education services. Santo Domingo school (New Mexico) illustrates the ways modifications of federal law and policy benefit children. (SLD)
Descriptors: American Indians, Compensatory Education, Economically Disadvantaged, Educational Policy