NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fonzi, Marie A. – Educational Leadership, 1982
Fred Wood and Steven Thompson claim that inservice educational practices should be changed because, first, more adults are operating at a lower stage of cognitive development than previously believed, and, second, adults prefer learning in informal social situations. This article challenges the adequacy of the research analysis underlying these…
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Cognitive Development, Educational Research, Experiential Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Steven R.; Wood, Fred H. – Educational Leadership, 1982
Defends the claims made in an earlier publication by the authors that inservice programs should be more experiential because the cognitive development of adults is less uniformly advanced than previously supposed and because experiential learning is more effective. Cites additional supportive research. (PGD)
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Cognitive Development, Educational Research, Experiential Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hughes, Carolyn Sue – Educational Leadership, 1981
The Questions to Upgrade and Encourage Student Thinking (QUEST) program is designed to improve student reading comprehension by improving teacher questioning skills. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Elementary Education, Inservice Teacher Education, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klein, Marvin L. – Educational Leadership, 1981
Seven key generalizations based on research findings from the study of children's language offer specific implications for classroom instruction and for instructional policy formulation and decision making. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Elementary Education, English Instruction, Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gibboney, Richard A. – Educational Leadership, 1987
Criticizes Madeline Hunter's teaching model emphasizing a perceived mechanistic and simplistic approach. Also stresses the ways the author feels the model negates the teaching of thinking skills. Attacks the scientific approach of Hunter's model, its philosophic perspective, and the training process. (MD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Staff Development