Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational Leadership | 12 |
Author
Bushman, James | 1 |
Buttram, Joan L. | 1 |
Conley, David T. | 1 |
Gandal, Matthew | 1 |
Guskey, Thomas R. | 1 |
Harris, Ben M. | 1 |
Kuralt, Richard C. | 1 |
McGiffert, Laura | 1 |
McGreal, Thomas L. | 1 |
Neill, Monty | 1 |
Nuttall, Dennis L. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 12 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Harris, Ben M. – Educational Leadership, 1987
Use of multiple data sources in evaluation, or congruence analysis, promotes effective teaching. Data are systematically compared from classroom observation, teacher self-analysis, and student descriptions. A set is produced by scaling data from criteria and source. Diagnoses with suggested action are most useful in improving instruction. (CJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Conley, David T. – Educational Leadership, 1987
Presents common attributes of effective evaluation systems, which are drawn from studies in Arizona, Michigan, and Vermont. Attributes include participant acceptance of validity, participant understanding of system mechanics and rationale, properly trained evaluators, a variety of evaluation methods, and evaluation as a district priority. (CJH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Improvement

Nuttall, Dennis L. – Educational Leadership, 1992
England's new General Certificate of Secondary Education examination has improved teaching and broadened the range of skills appraised. Besides demanding new skills, a new professionalism, and parents' and politicians' trust, performance assessment is costly and time-consuming. Despite all care and effort, some will not view this method as…
Descriptors: Costs, Educational Benefits, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries

Tesch, Stephanie; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1987
Pasco, Washington, School District will complete its fourth year using Thomas McGreal's (1983) goal-based teacher evaluation process. Describes the model's progressive phases designed to build teachers' responsibility for their own improvement. The plan invigorated teachers and improved teacher-administrator relationships. (CJH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Improvement, Program Development

McGreal, Thomas L. – Educational Leadership, 1982
Evaluation procedures should focus on improving instruction, should be realistic and practical, and should enhance the supervisor-teacher relationship. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Instructional Improvement

Kuralt, Richard C. – Educational Leadership, 1987
A junior high school principal describes how a small lap-top computer to record teacher and student classroom behavior assists in giving teachers an objective record and analysis. After independently analyzing the transcript, teacher and principal discuss recommendations during a postobservation conference. (CJH)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Improvement

Buttram, Joan L.; Wilson, Bruce L. – Educational Leadership, 1987
Discusses five methods of teacher evaluation used by progressive districts: (1) evaluation is linked to research on effective teaching; (2) evaluators receive improved training; (3) administrators are accountable for conducting evaluations; (4) evaluation-identified teacher deficiencies are used to focus staff development; and (5) teachers…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Inservice Teacher Education

Gandal, Matthew; McGiffert, Laura – Educational Leadership, 2003
Relates why educators should embrace tests as tools for transforming teaching and learning. States that rigorous and meaningful testing can help ensure the academic achievement of all students. Further, useful education assessments must make clear what they measure, and they must measure what educators value most. (Contains six references.) (WFA)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Course Evaluation, Educational Testing
Bushman, James – Educational Leadership, 2006
As a high school principal, the author came to realize that the traditional teacher observation and evaluation model did not help teachers become reflective and improve their practice. Because his own use of brief, frequent principal walk-throughs had given him valuable insights into the need for instructional improvements, he decided to offer…
Descriptors: Secondary School Teachers, Principals, Teacher Evaluation, Models

Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2003
Describes how to use quizzes, tests, writing assignments, and other assessments to improve instruction and help students learn. Suggests that instead of teaching to the test, teachers test what they teach and follow assessments with corrective instruction. Also discusses the benefits of assessments. (Contains 14 references.) (WFA)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Course Evaluation, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education

Neill, Monty – Educational Leadership, 2003
Asserts that educators should reject test-based reform and focus instead on assessment practices that encourage higher level learning. Simply demanding higher scores, even with rewards and sanctions attached, is ineffective. Academic success comes not by teaching to standardized tests but by teaching for deeper, important meaning. (Contains 22…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Achievement Gains, Educational Testing

Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2003
Discusses which kinds of data educators should respect and which they should reject. Asserts that most state accountability tests fail to produce the kinds of data that will improve teaching and learning. Teachers can get the data they need from their own instructionally useful classroom assessments. (WFA)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Data Analysis, Data Collection