Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Adults | 2 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Attention | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
Geometry | 1 |
Mathematics Tests | 1 |
Prior Learning | 1 |
Responses | 1 |
Schemata (Cognition) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Measurement:… | 2 |
Author
Arslan, Burcu | 2 |
Keehner, Madeleine | 2 |
Gong, Tao | 1 |
Jiang, Yang | 1 |
Katz, Irvin R. | 1 |
Lindner, Marlit Annalena | 1 |
Moon, Jung Aa | 1 |
Yan, Fred | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Moon, Jung Aa; Lindner, Marlit Annalena; Arslan, Burcu; Keehner, Madeleine – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Many test items use both an image and text, but present them in a spatially separate manner. This format could potentially cause a split-attention effect in which the test taker's cognitive load is increased by having to split attention between the image and text, while mentally integrating the two sources of information. We investigated the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Attention
Arslan, Burcu; Jiang, Yang; Keehner, Madeleine; Gong, Tao; Katz, Irvin R.; Yan, Fred – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Computer-based educational assessments often include items that involve drag-and-drop responses. There are different ways that drag-and-drop items can be laid out and different choices that test developers can make when designing these items. Currently, these decisions are based on experts' professional judgments and design constraints, rather…
Descriptors: Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Decision Making