Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Language Usage | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Objective Tests | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Response Style (Tests) | 1 |
| Responses | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGotch, Chad M.; French, Brian F. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2014
This work systematically reviews teacher assessment literacy measures within the context of contemporary teacher evaluation policy. In this study, the researchers collected objective tests of assessment knowledge, teacher self-reports, and rubrics to evaluate teachers' work in assessment literacy studies from 1991 to 2012. Then they evaluated…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Objective Tests, Measurement Techniques, Scoring Rubrics
Schafer, William D.; Gagne, Phill; Lissitz, Robert W. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005
An assumption that is fundamental to the scoring of student-constructed responses (e.g., essays) is the ability of raters to focus on the response characteristics of interest rather than on other features. A common example, and the focus of this study, is the ability of raters to score a response based on the content achievement it demonstrates…
Descriptors: Scoring, Language Usage, Effect Size, Student Evaluation
