NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xuelan Qiu; Jimmy de la Torre; You-Gan Wang; Jinran Wu – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) items have been found to be useful to reduce response biases in personality assessments. However, conventional scoring methods for the MFC items result in ipsative data, hindering the wider applications of the MFC format. In the last decade, a number of item response theory (IRT) models have been developed,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Personality Traits, Personality Measures, Personality Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Randall, Jennifer; Sireci, Stephen; Li, Xueming; Kaira, Leah – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2012
As access and reliance on technology continue to increase, so does the use of computerized testing for admissions, licensure/certification, and accountability exams. Nonetheless, full computer-based test (CBT) implementation can be difficult due to limited resources. As a result, some testing programs offer both CBT and paper-based test (PBT)…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Scores, Test Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pommerich, Mary – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2012
Neil Dorans has made a career of advocating for the examinee. He continues to do so in his NCME career award address, providing a thought-provoking commentary on some current trends in educational measurement that could potentially affect the integrity of test scores. Concerns expressed in the address call attention to a conundrum that faces…
Descriptors: Testing, Scores, Measurement, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Legg, Sue M.; Buhr, Dianne C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
Three computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in mathematics, reading, and writing were administered to 628 community college students to determine whether examinees of different ethnic, gender, ability, and age groups, and computer experience were differentially affected. Some differences exist; however, they do not preclude use of CATs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, College Students