Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Item Analysis | 4 |
Standards | 4 |
Test Items | 4 |
Minority Groups | 3 |
Test Bias | 3 |
Test Construction | 3 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Testing Problems | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Alignment (Education) | 1 |
College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Measurement:… | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Polikoff, Morgan S. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
Standards-based reform, as codified by the No Child Left Behind Act, relies on the ability of assessments to accurately reflect the learning that takes place in U.S. classrooms. However, this property of assessments--their instructional sensitivity--is rarely, if ever, investigated by test developers, states, or researchers. In this paper, the…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Psychometrics, Accountability, Teaching Methods

Bond, Lloyd – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article suggests that mechanical application of Golden Rule-like procedures is inappropriate. The fundamental idea embodied in them, namely, that of taking issues of equity into account in test construction, may reasonably be done without doing violence to test validity. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Item Analysis, Minority Groups, Standards

Jaeger, Richard M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This is a reprint of a 1986 letter by the former president of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) to New York and California legislators. The author outlines why NCME is opposed to legislative initiatives to extend Golden Rule procedures to tests in those states. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Letters (Correspondence), Minority Groups, Standards

Linn, Robert L.; Drasgow, Fritz – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article discusses the application of the Golden Rule procedure to items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Using item response theory, the analyses indicate that the Golden Rule procedures are ineffective in detecting biased items and may undermine the reliability and validity of tests. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory