Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Item Sampling | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Research Methodology | 1 |
| Sample Size | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Length | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLeifeng Xiao; Kit-Tai Hau; Melissa Dan Wang – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Short scales are time-efficient for participants and cost-effective in research. However, researchers often mistakenly expect short scales to have the same reliability as long ones without considering the effect of scale length. We argue that applying a universal benchmark for alpha is problematic as the impact of low-quality items is greater on…
Descriptors: Measurement, Benchmarking, Item Sampling, Sample Size
NCME 2008 Presidential Address: The Impact of Anchor Test Configuration on Student Proficiency Rates
Fitzpatrick, Anne R. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008
Examined in this study were the effects of reducing anchor test length on student proficiency rates for 12 multiple-choice tests administered in an annual, large-scale, high-stakes assessment. The anchor tests contained 15 items, 10 items, or five items. Five content representative samples of items were drawn at each anchor test length from a…
Descriptors: Test Length, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Sampling, Student Evaluation
