Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Researcher | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBaker, Eva L. – Educational Researcher, 2016
This article investigates the persistent and change elements of educational testing and assessment from 1920 to the present day. I show by examining the addresses and texts of American Educational Research Association presidents a continuing focus on schools, from early experiments and development up through applications in accountability systems.…
Descriptors: Research, Educational Testing, Presidents, Professional Associations
Peer reviewedBaker, Robert F. – Educational Researcher, 1975
Notes that the same technical terms may be used by publishers as those used by dedicated R & D organizations, but the level of investment and breadth of activity clearly differentiates the functions. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Research, Publications, Publishing Industry
Peer reviewedKlein, Susan S. – Educational Researcher, 1997
Responds to Robert Slavin's article "Design Competitions: A Proposal for a New Federal Role in Educational Research and Development" (Educational Researcher, 1997). Compares two approaches to improving federal educational research and development management: the System of Expert Panels, and Proposed Design Competitions. Key similarities…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSlavin, Robert E. – Educational Researcher, 1997
Responds to Sue Klein's comparative analysis on Design Competitions and Expert Panels (Educational Research, 1997) in which the author addresses drawbacks of the Expert Panels approach to educational product evaluation. Cautions that the approach is so minimalist a strategy that it could inhibit more serious attempts to build a system based on…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education
