Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Models | 3 |
Sample Size | 3 |
Test Length | 3 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Sciences: Theory… | 3 |
Author
Anil, Duygu | 1 |
Arsan, Nihan | 1 |
Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra | 1 |
Gök, Bilge | 1 |
Kelecioglu, Hülya | 1 |
Sahin, Alper | 1 |
Sengul Avsar, Asiye | 1 |
Tavsancil, Ezel | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sahin, Alper; Anil, Duygu – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2017
This study investigates the effects of sample size and test length on item-parameter estimation in test development utilizing three unidimensional dichotomous models of item response theory (IRT). For this purpose, a real language test comprised of 50 items was administered to 6,288 students. Data from this test was used to obtain data sets of…
Descriptors: Test Length, Sample Size, Item Response Theory, Test Construction
Sengul Avsar, Asiye; Tavsancil, Ezel – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2017
This study analysed polytomous items' psychometric properties according to nonparametric item response theory (NIRT) models. Thus, simulated datasets--three different test lengths (10, 20 and 30 items), three sample distributions (normal, right and left skewed) and three samples sizes (100, 250 and 500)--were generated by conducting 20…
Descriptors: Test Items, Psychometrics, Nonparametric Statistics, Item Response Theory
Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra; Arsan, Nihan; Gök, Bilge; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
This simulation study compared the performances (Type I error and power) of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), SIBTEST, and item response theory-likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) methods under certain conditions. Manipulated factors were sample size, ability differences between groups, test length, the percentage of differential item functioning (DIF), and underlying…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Test Bias