Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Writing Tests | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| English for Special Purposes | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Testing Service | 2 |
Author
| Haberman, Shelby J. | 1 |
| Kim, Hae-Jin | 1 |
| Powers, Donald E. | 1 |
| VanWinkle, Waverely | 1 |
| Weng, Vincent Z. | 1 |
| Yu, Feng | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Japan | 1 |
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textHaberman, Shelby J. – Educational Testing Service, 2011
Alternative approaches are discussed for use of e-rater[R] to score the TOEFL iBT[R] Writing test. These approaches involve alternate criteria. In the 1st approach, the predicted variable is the expected rater score of the examinee's 2 essays. In the 2nd approach, the predicted variable is the expected rater score of 2 essay responses by the…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays, Language Tests
Powers, Donald E.; Kim, Hae-Jin; Yu, Feng; Weng, Vincent Z.; VanWinkle, Waverely – Educational Testing Service, 2009
To facilitate the interpretation of test scores from the new TOEIC[R] (Test of English for International Communications[TM]) speaking and writing tests as measures of English-language proficiency, we administered a self-assessment inventory to TOEIC examinees in Japan and Korea, to gather their perceptions of their ability to perform a variety of…
Descriptors: English for Special Purposes, Language Tests, Writing Tests, Speech Tests
