Descriptor
Higher Education | 5 |
Predictive Validity | 5 |
Test Validity | 5 |
Correlation | 4 |
Personality Measures | 4 |
Counselor Training | 3 |
Grade Point Average | 3 |
Locus of Control | 3 |
Adolescents | 2 |
Dogmatism | 2 |
Graduate Study | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 8 |
Author
Omizo, Michael M. | 8 |
Michael, William B. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
The relationship was examined between six scales of the Locus of Control for Three Achievement Domains (LOCITAD), the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale, and the Rotter Internal-External Scale. Subjects were 140 adolescent boys and girls. Significant correlations provided some support for LOCITAD's validity. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Correlation

Omizo, Michael M.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Scores on the Graduate Record Examinations and undergraduate grade point averages were correlated with graduate grade point averages, specific course grades, and comprehensive examination scores for a sample of Master's students in counseling. Correlations were generally low to moderate. (JKS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Entrance Examinations, Counselor Training, Grade Point Average

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
This study examined the predictive validity of the Coopersmith Self Esteem Inventory with adolescents relative to each of the criterion measures representing communication satisfaction toward each parent and feelings toward each parent, and the differential validity of the self-esteem, communication satisfaction, and feelings toward each parent…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Correlation, Emotional Disturbances, Interpersonal Communication

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
Construct validity data found some support for the California Occupational Preference System constructs when its results were evaluated on a sample of 213 female undergraduates relative to the Vocational Preference Inventory results. (PN)
Descriptors: College Students, Correlation, Females, Higher Education

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
It was concluded that the self-actualization indices of the Personal Orientation Dimensions afford promise as predictors on ability in facilitative communication among counselor trainees, as measured by the Gross Rating of Facilitative Interpersonal Functioning Scale. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Training, Higher Education

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
A sample of 48 American Olympic contenders was compared with a sample of 63 undergraduate education majors with respect to scores on Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire and on three other scales. The athletes appeared to be more dominant, suspicious, self-sufficient, tense, and less sensitive. (CTM)
Descriptors: Athletes, Dogmatism, Education Majors, Higher Education

Omizo, Michael M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
This study examined the predictive validity of the 18 scales of the California Psychological Inventory and two scales of the Opinion Scale relative to success criteria in graduate school as measured by grades in individual courses, performance on the master's comprehensive examinations and graduate grade-point average. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Correlation, Counselor Training, Dogmatism, Grade Point Average

Omizo, Michael M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
This study examined (1) the predictive validity of the Differential Aptitude Tests (DAT) relative to the engineering, mathematics, and science grades and cumulative grade point averages of high school seniors in engineering; and (2) the differential validity of the eight DAT scales in comparing high and low achievers. (Autor/BW)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Engineering, Grade Point Average, Grades (Scholastic)