NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Source
Educational and Psychological…34
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 34 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ranger, Jochen; Kuhn, Jörg Tobias; Ortner, Tuulia M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
The hierarchical model of van der Linden is the most popular model for responses and response times in tests. It is composed of two separate submodels--one for the responses and one for the response times--that are joined at a higher level. The submodel for the response times is based on the lognormal distribution. The lognormal distribution is a…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Tests, Statistical Distributions, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hardre, Patricia L.; Crowson, H. Michael; Xie, Kui – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
Questionnaire instruments are frequently administered in digital formats, largely web-based, without much systematic investigation of possible effects from these administration methods. Furthermore, little attention has been given to the contextual lack of control for extraneous factors that may influence user responses. In this study, 263…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Online Surveys, Testing, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davison, Mark L.; Semmes, Robert; Huang, Lan; Close, Catherine N. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
Data from 181 college students were used to assess whether math reasoning item response times in computerized testing can provide valid and reliable measures of a speed dimension. The alternate forms reliability of the speed dimension was .85. A two-dimensional structural equation model suggests that the speed dimension is related to the accuracy…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Reaction Time, Reliability, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ng, Kok-Mun; Wang, Chuang; Kim, Do-Hong; Bodenhorn, Nancy – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2010
The authors investigated the factor structure of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence (SSREI) scale on international students. Via confirmatory factor analysis, the authors tested the fit of the models reported by Schutte et al. and five other studies to data from 640 international students in the United States. Results show that…
Descriptors: Emotional Intelligence, Factor Structure, Measures (Individuals), Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roos, Linda L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
The importance of item feedback in self-adapted testing was studied by comparing feedback and no feedback conditions for computerized adaptive tests and self-adapted tests taken by 363 college students. Results indicate that item feedback is not necessary to realize score differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Long, Edgar C. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
The development, preliminary assessment, and uses of two paper-and-pencil measures of dyadic perspective-taking are described. A literature review revealed 23 perspective-taking type items each for the Self Dyadic Perspective-Taking Scale and the Other Dyadic Perspective-Taking Scale. Results for 277 college students indicate that the tests are…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Perspective Taking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
De Ayala, R. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1989
A polychotomous nominal response model-based computerized adaptive test (CAT) was simulated using data from 1,093 University of Texas students. The ability estimation of this model and its overall performance were compared with those of a dichotomous three-parameter logistic model-based CAT. Advantages and drawbacks of nominal response CAT are…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
No significant differences in performance on a self-adapted test or anxiety were found for college students (n=218) taking a self-adapted test who selected item difficulty without any prior information, inspected an item before selecting, or answered a typical item and received performance feedback. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maurer, Todd J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
One implication of attitude self-ratings, that scales may become recalibrated transiently, was investigated conservatively using hypothesized shifts of data from 368 college students rating the desirability of taking senior comprehensive examinations. Results support the validity and reliability of simple graphic rating scales as measures of…
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, College Students, Graphs, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barter, Alice – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Farley, Frank H.; Haubrich, Alice S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Expands upon the Farley (1967) study in three ways: (1) use of experimental manipulation of social desirability response set rather than correlational analysis, (2) use of the recent revision of the Sensation Seeking Scale, and (3) inclusion of sex comparisons. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Individual Differences, Psychological Testing, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berdie, Ralph F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
An experiment was conducted to determine whether a correspondence exists between what students say they know, and what they actually know as shown by an achievement test. Results suggest that for survey purposes, asking people whether they possess information may be a satisfactory method for determining their knowledge. (MS)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Check Lists, College Students, Educational Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vispoel, Walter P.; Boo, Jaeyool; Bleiler, Timothy – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Evaluated the characteristics of computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) using scores for 224 college students. Results show that mode of administration has little effect on the psychometric properties of the SES although the computerized version took longer and was preferred by examinees. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kuncel, Ruth Boutin; Fiske, Donald W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Four hypotheses regarding stability of response process and response in personality testing are tested and supported. (RC)
Descriptors: College Students, Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Calabrese, Frank J.; Lana, Robert E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Sixty subjects, 30 volunteers and 30 nonvolunteers, participated in an experiment examining pretest sensitization effects. Two interpretations of these effects--the commitment hypothesis and the demand interpretation--are explored. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Inhibition
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3