Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Computation | 10 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 10 |
Test Items | 9 |
Adaptive Testing | 7 |
Item Response Theory | 7 |
Accuracy | 3 |
Classification | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 3 |
Selection | 3 |
Simulation | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 10 |
Author
Brown, Anna | 1 |
Enders, Craig K | 1 |
Finch, W. Holmes | 1 |
Glasnapp, Douglas R. | 1 |
Gorham, Jerry | 1 |
Haynie, Kathleen | 1 |
He, Wei | 1 |
Jiao, Hong | 1 |
Lin, Yin | 1 |
Liu, Chen-Wei | 1 |
Liu, Junhui | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Finch, W. Holmes – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Psychometricians have devoted much research and attention to categorical item responses, leading to the development and widespread use of item response theory for the estimation of model parameters and identification of items that do not perform in the same way for examinees from different population subgroups (e.g., differential item functioning…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Item Response Theory, Computation, Methods
Lin, Yin; Brown, Anna – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
A fundamental assumption in computerized adaptive testing is that item parameters are invariant with respect to context--items surrounding the administered item. This assumption, however, may not hold in forced-choice (FC) assessments, where explicit comparisons are made between items included in the same block. We empirically examined the…
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Measurement Techniques, Context Effect, Test Items
Seo, Dong Gi; Weiss, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
Most computerized adaptive tests (CATs) have been studied using the framework of unidimensional item response theory. However, many psychological variables are multidimensional and might benefit from using a multidimensional approach to CATs. This study investigated the accuracy, fidelity, and efficiency of a fully multidimensional CAT algorithm…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Accuracy, Fidelity
Wang, Chun – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) purports to combine the strengths of both CAT and cognitive diagnosis. Cognitive diagnosis models aim at classifying examinees into the correct mastery profile group so as to pinpoint the strengths and weakness of each examinee whereas CAT algorithms choose items to determine those…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Jiao, Hong; Liu, Junhui; Haynie, Kathleen; Woo, Ada; Gorham, Jerry – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
This study explored the impact of partial credit scoring of one type of innovative items (multiple-response items) in a computerized adaptive version of a large-scale licensure pretest and operational test settings. The impacts of partial credit scoring on the estimation of the ability parameters and classification decisions in operational test…
Descriptors: Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Measures (Individuals), Scoring
He, Wei; Reckase, Mark D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
For computerized adaptive tests (CATs) to work well, they must have an item pool with sufficient numbers of good quality items. Many researchers have pointed out that, in developing item pools for CATs, not only is the item pool size important but also the distribution of item parameters and practical considerations such as content distribution…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing
Wang, Wen-Chung; Liu, Chen-Wei – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
The generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM) has been recently developed to describe item responses to Likert items (agree-disagree) in attitude measurement. In this study, the authors (a) developed two item selection methods in computerized classification testing under the GGUM, the current estimate/ability confidence interval method and the cut…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Classification, Item Response Theory
Penfield, Randall D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2007
The standard error of the maximum likelihood ability estimator is commonly estimated by evaluating the test information function at an examinee's current maximum likelihood estimate (a point estimate) of ability. Because the test information function evaluated at the point estimate may differ from the test information function evaluated at an…
Descriptors: Simulation, Adaptive Testing, Computation, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Yang, Xiangdong; Poggio, John C.; Glasnapp, Douglas R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
The effects of five ability estimators, that is, maximum likelihood estimator, weighted likelihood estimator, maximum a posteriori, expected a posteriori, and Owen's sequential estimator, on the performances of the item response theory-based adaptive classification procedure on multiple categories were studied via simulations. The following…
Descriptors: Classification, Computation, Simulation, Item Response Theory
Nietfeld, John L.; Enders, Craig K; Schraw, Gregory – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
Researchers studying monitoring accuracy currently use two different indexes to estimate accuracy: relative accuracy and absolute accuracy. The authors compared the distributional properties of two measures of monitoring accuracy using Monte Carlo procedures that fit within these categories. They manipulated the accuracy of judgments (i.e., chance…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Test Items, Computation, Metacognition