Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Effect Size | 12 |
Research Methodology | 12 |
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Sample Size | 4 |
Sampling | 4 |
Statistical Analysis | 4 |
Statistical Studies | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Correlation | 3 |
Meta Analysis | 3 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 12 |
Author
Algina, James | 2 |
Hinkle, Dennis E. | 2 |
Keselman, H. J. | 2 |
Aguinis, Herman | 1 |
Block, Richard A. | 1 |
Carson, Kenneth P. | 1 |
Chan, Darius K.-S. | 1 |
Cheung, Shu Fai | 1 |
Jessica A. R. Logan | 1 |
Kelley, Ken | 1 |
Menglin Xu | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 12 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Menglin Xu; Jessica A. R. Logan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Research designs that include planned missing data are gaining popularity in applied education research. These methods have traditionally relied on introducing missingness into data collections using the missing completely at random (MCAR) mechanism. This study assesses whether planned missingness can also be implemented when data are instead…
Descriptors: Research Design, Research Methodology, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Analysis

Algina, James; Keselman, H. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2003
Investigated the approximate confidence intervals for effect sizes developed by K. Bird (2002) and proposed a more accurate method developed through simulation studies. The average coverage probability for the new method was 0.959. (SLD)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Research Methodology, Simulation
Cheung, Shu Fai; Chan, Darius K.-S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
In meta-analysis, it is common to have dependent effect sizes, such as several effect sizes from the same sample but measured at different times. Cheung and Chan proposed the adjusted-individual and adjusted-weighted procedures to estimate the degree of dependence and incorporate this estimate in the meta-analysis. The present study extends the…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Academic Achievement, Meta Analysis, Correlation
Algina, James; Keselman, H. J.; Penfield, Randall D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
Kelley compared three methods for setting a confidence interval (CI) around Cohen's standardized mean difference statistic: the noncentral-"t"-based, percentile (PERC) bootstrap, and biased-corrected and accelerated (BCA) bootstrap methods under three conditions of nonnormality, eight cases of sample size, and six cases of population…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Comparative Analysis, Sample Size, Investigations
Pierce, Charles A.; Block, Richard A.; Aguinis, Herman – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
The authors provide a cautionary note on reporting accurate eta-squared values from multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs. They reinforce the distinction between classical and partial eta-squared as measures of strength of association. They provide examples from articles published in premier psychology journals in which the authors…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Research Methodology, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods

Thompson, Bruce – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Use of the bootstrap method in a canonical correlation analysis to evaluate the replicability of a study's results is illustrated. More confidence may be vested in research results that replicate. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Correlation, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods

Hinkle, Dennis E.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
The authors previously discussed the importance of effect size and Type II errors as factors in determining sample size. Tables were developed and presented for one-factor designs with k levels. As these tables could not be used for the one sample case, comparable tables were developed and are presented. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Effect Size, Research Methodology, Sample Size

Hinkle, Dennis E.; Oliver, J. Dale – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
In this paper, tables for the appropriate sample sizes are presented and discussed in the context that the determination of the effect size must precede the determination of the sample size. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Research Methodology, Research Needs, Research Problems

Nye, Lendell G.; Witt, L. Alan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Basic rules are suggested to replace the signed coefficient rule to infer the form of moderator effects in terms of slopes of regression lines. Steps are provided to interpret the form of moderator effects that can be achieved using only the regression coefficients of the predictor variable and interaction term. (SLD)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Meta Analysis, Prediction

Carson, Kenneth P.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
The utility of the fail-safe "N" statistic was evaluated by computing it for studies in three organizational research domains in which discrepant conclusions were reached by initial and subsequent meta-analyses. Calculation of the fail-safe "N" may have led to more cautious interpretations. Implications for meta-analyses are…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Institutional Research
Wang, Wen-Chung – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
The Pearson correlation is used to depict effect sizes in the context of item response theory. Amultidimensional Rasch model is used to directly estimate the correlation between latent traits. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to investigate whether the population correlation could be accurately estimated and whether the bootstrap method…
Descriptors: Test Length, Sampling, Effect Size, Correlation
Kelley, Ken – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2005
The standardized group mean difference, Cohen's "d", is among the most commonly used and intuitively appealing effect sizes for group comparisons. However, reporting this point estimate alone does not reflect the extent to which sampling error may have led to an obtained value. A confidence interval expresses the uncertainty that exists between…
Descriptors: Intervals, Sampling, Integrity, Effect Size