NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roos, Linda L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
The importance of item feedback in self-adapted testing was studied by comparing feedback and no feedback conditions for computerized adaptive tests and self-adapted tests taken by 363 college students. Results indicate that item feedback is not necessary to realize score differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smither, James W.; Walker, Alan G.; Yap, Michael K. T. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
In this study, 5,257employees provided upward feedback ratings for 759 target managers who had the option of having their subordinates rate them using a traditional paper-and-pencil (opscan) response mode or using the company's intranet. Preliminary analyses showed mean online ratings were more favorable than were mean paper-and-pencil ratings (d…
Descriptors: Feedback, Evaluation Methods, Measures (Individuals), Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
No significant differences in performance on a self-adapted test or anxiety were found for college students (n=218) taking a self-adapted test who selected item difficulty without any prior information, inspected an item before selecting, or answered a typical item and received performance feedback. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing