NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
A latent variable modeling approach for scale reliability evaluation in heterogeneous populations is discussed. The method can be used for point and interval estimation of reliability of multicomponent measuring instruments in populations representing mixtures of an unknown number of latent classes or subpopulations. The procedure is helpful also…
Descriptors: Test Reliability, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bishara, Anthony J.; Hittner, James B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
It is more common for educational and psychological data to be nonnormal than to be approximately normal. This tendency may lead to bias and error in point estimates of the Pearson correlation coefficient. In a series of Monte Carlo simulations, the Pearson correlation was examined under conditions of normal and nonnormal data, and it was compared…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Monte Carlo Methods, Correlation, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaffer, Juliet Popper; Gillo, Martin W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Research Methodology, Sampling, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Bruce – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Three problems with stepwise research methods are explored. Computer packages may use incorrect degrees of freedom in stepwise computations. In addition, stepwise methods do not identify correctly the best variable set of a given size. A third problem is that stepwise methods tend to capitalize on sampling error. (SLD)
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Error of Measurement, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Bruce – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Use of the bootstrap method in a canonical correlation analysis to evaluate the replicability of a study's results is illustrated. More confidence may be vested in research results that replicate. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Correlation, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feir-Walsh, Betty J.; Toothaker, Larry E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hinkle, Dennis E.; Oliver, J. Dale – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
In this paper, tables for the appropriate sample sizes are presented and discussed in the context that the determination of the effect size must precede the determination of the sample size. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Research Methodology, Research Needs, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forsyth, Robert A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Correlation, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Donald C.; Klein, Donald F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
The variance of the sample difference and the power of the "F" test for mean differences were studied under group matching on covariates and also under random assignment. Results shed light on systematic assignment procedures advocated to provide more precise estimates of treatment effects than simple random assignment. (TJH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Monte Carlo Methods, Outcomes of Treatment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rudner, Lawrence M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
The relationship between item parameter values obtained from independent Birnbaum (l968) model calibrations of the same item set from two different samples is examined. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kleinke, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Norms, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Wen-Chung – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
The Pearson correlation is used to depict effect sizes in the context of item response theory. Amultidimensional Rasch model is used to directly estimate the correlation between latent traits. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to investigate whether the population correlation could be accurately estimated and whether the bootstrap method…
Descriptors: Test Length, Sampling, Effect Size, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelley, Ken – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2005
The standardized group mean difference, Cohen's "d", is among the most commonly used and intuitively appealing effect sizes for group comparisons. However, reporting this point estimate alone does not reflect the extent to which sampling error may have led to an obtained value. A confidence interval expresses the uncertainty that exists between…
Descriptors: Intervals, Sampling, Integrity, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, H. Jane; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1989
The validity of logistic test models and computer simulation methods for generating sampling distributions of item bias statistics was evaluated under the hypothesis of no item bias. Test data from 937 ninth-grade students were used to develop 7 steps for applying computer-simulated baseline statistics in test development. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Grade 9