Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 9 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Cornell Critical Thinking Test | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
Watson Glaser Critical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schweizer, Karl; Reiß, Siegbert; Troche, Stefan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2019
The article reports three simulation studies conducted to find out whether the effect of a time limit for testing impairs model fit in investigations of structural validity, whether the representation of the assumed source of the effect prevents impairment of model fit and whether it is possible to identify and discriminate this method effect from…
Descriptors: Timed Tests, Testing, Barriers, Testing Problems
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
In a pioneering research article, Wollack and colleagues suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect test tampering. The EDI can be used with or without a continuity correction and is assumed to follow the standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis of no test tampering. When used without a continuity correction,…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Error of Measurement
Robitzsch, Alexander; Rupp, Andre A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009
This article describes the results of a simulation study to investigate the impact of missing data on the detection of differential item functioning (DIF). Specifically, it investigates how four methods for dealing with missing data (listwise deletion, zero imputation, two-way imputation, response function imputation) interact with two methods of…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Simulation, Interaction, Effect Size

Barcikowski, Robert S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Item Sampling, Testing Problems

Yarnold, Paul R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
Unreliable profiles impose the difficulty that ordinal and interval relations among the individual's scores become uncertain or unstable. A profile reliability coefficient is derived to estimate the relative expected extent of this ordinal and interval "inversion" for any profile of K measures. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Mathematical Models, Profiles, Test Reliability

Cureton, Edward E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
A derivation of a formula for the stability coefficient is presented and discussed in terms of test reliability over time. (PR)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Raw Scores, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability

Alderman, Donald L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Student self-selection in deciding to repeat a test was examined by contrasting the test performance of students taking the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) as juniors and again as seniors with the test performance of students taking the SAT only once as juniors. Results suggest there is self-selection in test repetition. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Scores

Cahan, Sorel; Cohen, Nora – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
A solution is offered to problems associated with the inequality in the manipulability of probabilities of classification errors of masters versus nonmasters, based on competency test results. Eschewing the typical arbitrary establishment of observed-score standards below 100 percent, the solution incorporates a self-correction of wrong answers.…
Descriptors: Classification, Error of Measurement, Mastery Tests, Minimum Competency Testing

Modjeski, Richard B.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
Two tests of critical thinking (the Cornell Critical Thinking Test and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal) were evaluated by a panel of psychologists relative to the validity, reliability, and error of measurement standards stated in the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests," 1974. (PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Critical Thinking, Error of Measurement, Evaluation Criteria