Descriptor
Multiple Regression Analysis | 4 |
Validity | 4 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Admission Criteria | 1 |
Computer Programs | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Data Processing | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Graduate Students | 1 |
Job Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 4 |
Author
Aamodt, Michael G. | 1 |
Huberty, Carl J. | 1 |
Kimbrough, Wilson W. | 1 |
Messmer, Donald J. | 1 |
Mourad, Salah A. | 1 |
Sands, William A. | 1 |
Solomon, Robert J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Huberty, Carl J.; Mourad, Salah A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Real data are used to illustrate the comparison of two estimators for the square of a population correlation coefficient and the true validity of a sample prediction equation. Interpretive approaches to, and problems in, multiple correlation/prediction estimation are discussed. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Correlation, Multiple Regression Analysis, Predictive Measurement, Validity

Messmer, Donald J.; Solomon, Robert J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
A method for testing differential predictability in a selection model was illustrated on data from 103 male and 24 female graduate students. Since the models were not homogeneous in the variance, a method for adjusting for heterogeneity was presented. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Mathematical Models

Sands, William A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Two computer programs (one batch, one interactive) are designed to provide statistics for a weighted linear combination of several component variables. Both programs provide mean, variance, standard deviation, and a validity coefficient. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Processing, Multiple Regression Analysis, Online Systems

Aamodt, Michael G.; Kimbrough, Wilson W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
Four methods were used to weight predictors associated with a Resident Assistant job: (1) rank order weights; (2) unit weights; (3) critical incident weights; and (4) regression weights. A cross-validation was also done. Most weighting methods were highly related. No method was superior in terms of protection from validity shrinkage. (GDC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Job Analysis