Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 1 |
| Confidentiality | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Imitation | 1 |
| Instructional Design | 1 |
| Learning Modules | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Positive Attitudes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| European Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Sweden (Stockholm) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAndersson, Magnus; Weurlander, Maria – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2019
Here, we present a module to introduce student peer review of laboratory reports to engineering students. Our findings show that students were positive and felt that they had learnt quite a lot from this experience. The most important part of the module was the classification scheme. The scheme was constructed to mimic the way an expert would…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Engineering Education, Positive Attitudes, Classification
