NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heath, Linda; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1982
A problem for program evaluators involves a search for ways to maximize internal validity and inferential power of research designs while being able to assess long-term effects of social programs. A multimethodological research strategy combining a delayed control group true experiment with a multiple time series and switching replications design…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schochet, Peter; Burghardt, John – Evaluation Review, 2007
This article discusses the use of propensity scoring in experimental program evaluations to estimate impacts for subgroups defined by program features and participants' program experiences. The authors discuss estimation issues and provide specification tests. They also discuss the use of an overlooked data collection design--obtaining predictions…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Scoring, Experimental Programs, Control Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stoker, Howard W.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1981
The use of analysis of variance was examined under the assumption that the treatment had been randomly assigned to students, when in fact, the class had been the unit. Data support the idea that if one can randomly assign treatments to intact classes, consideration should certainly be given to doing so. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shapiro, Jonathan Z. – Evaluation Review, 1984
The need to attend to both methodological and social concerns is demonstrated in two examples: one where the unchecked effects of the social consequences of a methodologically rigorous research design invalidated the evaluation and a second where explicit trade-offs between methodological rigor and social costs enabled the evaluation to proceed.…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Control Groups, Participant Characteristics, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Algina, James; Olejnik, Stephen F. – Evaluation Review, 1982
A method is presented for analyzing data collected in a multiple group time-series design. This consists of testing linear hypotheses about the experimental and control group-means. Both a multivariate and a univariate procedure are described. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roos, Leslie L., Jr.; Nicol, J. Patrick – Evaluation Review, 1981
Criteria for suitable research designs for use with large databases are suggested and analyzed. The advantages and disadvantages of several types of quasi-experimental designs are compared. Examples are taken from the authors' research with data from the Manitoba Health Services Commission. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Databases, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Staines, Graham L.; Cleland, Charles M.; Blankertz, Laura – Evaluation Review, 2006
Evaluation research on vocational counseling in substance dependency treatment should distinguish between the effects of counselors and counseling methods on clients' employment outcomes. Three experimental designs permit investigation of possible confounds between these types of effects: (a) nested designs (each counselor delivers one counseling…
Descriptors: Counseling Techniques, Vocational Rehabilitation, Control Groups, Career Counseling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Toedter, Lori J.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1990
The problem of the appropriate comparison group for bereavement studies is discussed. The use of the retrospective pretest design is illustrated through a longitudinal study of bereavement outcome following pregnancy loss, involving 138 bereaved women and a comparison group of 215 currently pregnant women. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Bereavement, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dwyer, James H. – Evaluation Review, 1984
A solution to the problem of specification error due to excluded variables in statistical models of treatment effects in nonrandomized (nonequivalent) control group designs is presented. It involves longitudinal observation with at least two pretests. A maximum likelihood estimation program such as LISREL may provide reasonable estimates of…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Mathematical Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moberg, D. Paul; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1993
Difficulties experienced in implementing a randomized design in a school-based adolescent health promotion program are explained, and a solution using a randomized control group design nested within two treatment options is proposed. The Health for Life project involved 21 middle schools in Wisconsin. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Health Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grossman, Jean; Tierney, Joseph P. – Evaluation Review, 1993
Evidence is presented that strengthens the argument against comparison group research strategies. Results from a study of youth attitudes related to the California Conservation Corps involving 528 participants and 668 comparisons indicate that the comparison group may not adequately represent the nontreatment state. (SLD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Experimental Groups