NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moreno, Lorenzo; Trevino, Ernesto; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu; Mendive, Susana; Reyes, Joaquin; Godoy, Felipe; Del Rio, Francisca; Snow, Catherine; Leyva, Diana; Barata, Clara; Arbour, MaryCatherine; Rolla, Andrea – Evaluation Review, 2011
Evaluation designs for social programs are developed assuming minimal or no disruption from external shocks, such as natural disasters. This is because extremely rare shocks may not make it worthwhile to account for them in the design. Among extreme shocks is the 2010 Chile earthquake. Un Buen Comienzo (UBC), an ongoing early childhood program in…
Descriptors: Research Design, Natural Disasters, Foreign Countries, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shadish, William R.; Epstein, Roberta – Evaluation Review, 1987
Using a stratified random sample, this study surveyed the practices of program evaluators. Practices factored into four patterns: academic evaluation, stakeholder service evaluation, decision-driven evaluation, and outcome evaluation. (RB)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Radcliff, Benjamin – Evaluation Review, 1986
This article evaluates three general types of computer-assisted approaches to multicriteria decision problems in which criteria are attributes as opposed to objectives. Several programs specifically designed for multiattribute problems, as well as spreadsheets and decision-free software, are discussed. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Microcomputers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nagel, Stuart S. – Evaluation Review, 1983
New, simple methods for applying benefit-cost analysis in situations where the variables are nonmonetary are discussed. The approach involves handling nonmonetary variables by converting the problems into questions regarding whether a nonmonetary return is worth more or less than a given dollar cost. The article codifies what good decision makers…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Program Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hall, Owen P., Jr. – Evaluation Review, 1986
This article outlines an approach for developing and applying computerized decision support systems to the formulation and evaluation of public policy. To meet the challenge of financial resource limitations, new management systems must be developed to improve both governmental efficiency and decision-making effectiveness. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Federal Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Robert D.; Prentice, David G. – Evaluation Review, 1987
This article reports on how short scales can be used to assess the perceived risks that exist for decision makers, their perception of the decision context and their perceived information needs. Three scales are described: (1) a Decision Risk Scale; (2) a Decision Context Inventory; and (3) a Need for Information Inventory. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Higher Education, Information Needs, Nurses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nagel, Stuart S. – Evaluation Review, 1986
This issue discusses the relevance of microcomputers to evaluation research and program evaluation. The relevance of software designed to aid in making decisions, establishing relations through statistical analysis, and gathering information is emphasized. The relevance of hardware, word processing, and teaching is also discussed. (BS)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Databases, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leviton, Laura C.; Boruch, Robert F. – Evaluation Review, 1983
Federal evaluations in education contributed in numerous and important ways to changes in law, regulation, and management. Information about implementation contributed most often, but information about outcomes, cost, and federal administration also made contributions. These findings differ from previous research that concluded evaluations do not…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Legislation, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Syme, Geoffrey J.; Sadler, Brian S. – Evaluation Review, 1994
Evaluation of decisions incorporating public involvement is an area where views might differ according to the role of the stakeholder. Six general criteria for adequate evaluation of public involvement programs are presented in the context of a case study. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Criteria, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fitzpatrick, Jody L. – Evaluation Review, 1988
The evaluator's role in planning/implementing an evaluation of a new program to train school administrators in performance appraisal skills is described. This case study of the evaluators' broadening roles uses E. Chelimsky's continuum (1987) to analyze political processes and decision making involved in the evaluation of a state-funded program.…
Descriptors: Administrators, Case Studies, Decision Making, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newman, Dianna L.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1983
This study investigated factors influencing use of evaluative information for decision making by administrators and school boards. The factors investigated included: (1) the quality of the decision to be made; (2) the amount of personal conflict involved; (3) the context of the program, and (4) whether participants were board members or…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pancer, S. Mark; Westhues, Anne – Evaluation Review, 1989
Evaluation research, if appropriately matched to a human service program's stage of development, can help inform the decision making at each step. The developmental stages of a program, questions to be answered at each stage, and kinds of research activities pertinent to such questions are discussed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, John A. – Evaluation Review, 1980
An example is provided of an evaluation in which the formulation of explicit decision rules was a central activity. The case for and against the use of decision rules in program evaluation is considered, and the appropriate context identified. Implications for the rights of decision makers are addressed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Criteria, Decision Making, Educational Planning, Evaluation