Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 5 |
Problem Solving | 5 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Logical Thinking | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Writing Skills | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Check Lists | 1 |
Cognitive Structures | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evaluation Review | 5 |
Author
Bolus, Roger | 2 |
Klein, Stephen | 2 |
Shavelson, Richard | 2 |
Benjamin, Roger | 1 |
Freedman, David | 1 |
Kennedy, Mary M. | 1 |
Marshall, James | 1 |
Peters, Michael | 1 |
Ross, John A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Klein, Stephen; Freedman, David; Shavelson, Richard; Bolus, Roger – Evaluation Review, 2008
The Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) program measures value added in colleges and universities, by testing the ability of freshmen and seniors to think logically and write clearly. The program is popular enough that it has attracted critics. In this paper, we outline the methods used by the CLA to determine value added. We summarize the…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Logical Thinking, College Freshmen, College Seniors
Klein, Stephen; Benjamin, Roger; Shavelson, Richard; Bolus, Roger – Evaluation Review, 2007
The Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) is a computer administered, open-ended (as opposed to multiple-choice) test of analytic reasoning, critical thinking, problem solving, and written communication skills. Because the CLA has been endorsed by several national higher education commissions, it has come under intense scrutiny by faculty members,…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Educational Assessment, Performance Tests, Logical Thinking

Kennedy, Mary M. – Evaluation Review, 1983
In-house evaluators must develop evaluation procedures that accommodate not only their own professional standards but also the problem-solving styles of the organizations they serve. This article describes how a small sample of evaluators have adapted their methods to their contexts. (Author)
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Interpersonal Communication

Peters, Michael; Marshall, James – Evaluation Review, 1993
A methodology is developed for producing a well-designed problem in policy analysis. This evaluative context methodology is defined as an iterative process based on a series of checklist questions. Use of the methodology is demonstrated in a policy development project in New Zealand devoted to encouraging use of the Maori language. (SLD)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

Ross, John A. – Evaluation Review, 1985
This article proposes that the behavior of teachers conducting small-scale evaluations of their own programs is analogous to the behavior of students solving curriculum-specific problems in classrooms and that teaching methods for training students in problem-solving skills can be usefully adapted to training teachers in evaluation skills.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Structures, Committees, Decision Making Skills, Elementary Secondary Education