Descriptor
| Ethics | 4 |
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Evaluators | 3 |
| Accountability | 2 |
| Evaluation | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| Conflict Resolution | 1 |
| Contracts | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 4 |
Author
| Garaway, G. B. | 1 |
| Neigher, William | 1 |
| Sanders, Nancy | 1 |
| Sheinfeld, Sherri Nita | 1 |
| Sieber, Joan E. | 1 |
| Windle, Charles | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSheinfeld, Sherri Nita – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978
Six values useful for judging the ethical problems in program evaluation are: (1) distributive justice; (2) truth seeking; (3) human dignity; (4) sharing; (5) concern for the quality of life, and (6) client loyalty. This is a comment on TM 503 780. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Moral Values
Peer reviewedGaraway, G. B. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
A discussion of current issues in evaluation, related to society's expectation that evaluation is based on scientific authority, is followed by an exploration of concepts of "validity" and "values." The role of the evaluator is increasingly involved in issues of ethics and social justice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewedSieber, Joan E.; Sanders, Nancy – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978
The evaluator must begin with a clear understanding of roles, issues, and risks in order to minimize the pressures and occurrence of ethical conflicts in program evaluation. A list of such issues is included in this review of TM 503 780. (CTM)
Descriptors: Accountability, Contracts, Ethics, Evaluation
Peer reviewedWindle, Charles; Neigher, William – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978
Ethical problems in program evaluation are increased when conflicting or incompatible models are applied concurrently. Three models are illustrated: an amelioration model, for a program's own decision makers; an accountability model, focusing on public data disclosure; and an advocacy model, designed to advance the program's interest. Case…
Descriptors: Accountability, Codes of Ethics, Conflict Resolution, Decision Making
