NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 32 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Corn, Jenifer O.; Byrom, Elizabeth; Knestis, Kirk; Matzen, Nita; Thrift, Beth – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2012
Schools, districts, and state-level educational organizations are experiencing a great shift in the way they do the business of education. This shift focuses on accountability, specifically through the expectation of the effective utilization of evaluative-focused efforts to guide and support decisions about educational program implementation. In…
Descriptors: Expertise, Evaluators, Formative Evaluation, Program Implementation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
O'Sullivan, Rita G. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2012
Collaborative Evaluation systematically invites and engages stakeholders in program evaluation planning and implementation. Unlike "distanced" evaluation approaches, which reject stakeholder participation as evaluation team members, Collaborative Evaluation assumes that active, on-going engagement between evaluators and program staff,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levin-Rozalis, Miri – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2010
This paper addresses the issue of the knowledge gap between evaluators and the entity being evaluated: the dilemma of the knowledge of professional evaluators vs. the in-depth knowledge of the evaluated subjects. In order to optimize evaluative outcomes, the author suggests an approach based on ideas borrowed from the science of cybernetics as a…
Descriptors: Cybernetics, Evaluators, Knowledge Level, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toal, Stacie A.; King, Jean A.; Johnson, Kelli; Lawrenz, Frances – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009
As the number of large federal programs increases, so, too, does the need for a more complete understanding of how to conduct evaluations of such complex programs. The research literature has documented the benefits of stakeholder participation in smaller-scale program evaluations. However, given the scope and diversity of projects in multi-site…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Federal Programs, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Love, A. J.; Russon, C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Describes efforts to build a worldwide evaluation community, noting events that resulted in an almost 200% growth in the number of regional and national evaluation organizations in slightly more than 1 year. Profiles some national and regional evaluation organizations that participated in a recent evaluation meeting and suggests some alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, International Organizations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Neale, Jenny; Owen, John M.; Small, Debbie – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2003
Outlines a training strategy that has been used to encourage evaluators to make sense of codes of behavior and to incorporate such codes into their work. By grouping standards into broad categories, evaluators, and those who commission evaluations, can concentrate on the relevant aspects of the evaluation stage. (SLD)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lau, Genevieve; LeMahieu, Paul – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
Evaluation of the Humanities Education, Research, and Language Development (HERALD) Project in the San Francisco Unified School District (California), which focused on teacher empowerment, shows the value of close collaboration between external evaluators and teachers as internal evaluators. Evaluator-teacher collaboration made evaluation more…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Sullivan, Rita G.; O'Sullivan, John M. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1998
The Evaluation Voices approach collaboratively united perspectives of program stakeholders, evaluators, and network partners to strengthen individual program evaluation strategies. This approach is described, with emphasis on the shared experience of evaluators and network partners. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garaway, G. B. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
A discussion of current issues in evaluation, related to society's expectation that evaluation is based on scientific authority, is followed by an exploration of concepts of "validity" and "values." The role of the evaluator is increasingly involved in issues of ethics and social justice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mangano, Michael F. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1992
Describes lessons evaluators can learn from the Honda Motor Company and how an evaluation office within the Department of Health and Human Services has applied these lessons. The lessons include (1) sound market research; (2) creating top-notch production capabilities; (3) building a better mousetrap; and (4) aggressive product selling. (SLD)
Descriptors: Business Administration, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Marketing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caulley, Darrel N.; Dowdy, Irene – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1987
Compares legal case histories to case histories for the evaluation profession. Discusses the nature, place, and use of case histories in the law and tries to envision the nature and use of evaluation case histories. Case histories could provide knowledge and examples of how to do evaluations. (RB)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Law Related Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McLemore, Jacqueline R.; Neumann, Jean E. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1987
The importance of addressing the political dynamics inherent in any evaluation research process is discussed. The theoretical orientation contributing to the denial and avoidance of politics is articulated and contrasted with one which posits politics as normative and useful. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Political Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tanji, Joy M. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1993
Evaluators vary in their propensity to make direct valuative judgments of program worth. The decision to include recommendations with a report or provide merely descriptive evaluation depends on individuals' perspectives concerning the nature of reality, truth and values, human agency, and informational utility. (SLD)
Descriptors: Beliefs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sieber, Joan E.; Sanders, Nancy – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978
The evaluator must begin with a clear understanding of roles, issues, and risks in order to minimize the pressures and occurrence of ethical conflicts in program evaluation. A list of such issues is included in this review of TM 503 780. (CTM)
Descriptors: Accountability, Contracts, Ethics, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hess, Brian – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Illustrates the use of latent growth modeling (LGM) as an analytical tool in program evaluation using the hypothetical example of a high school drug prevention program. Demonstrates the use of LGM in assessing longitudinal impact and in incorporating predictors of status and growth into a model. Highlights advantages and limitations of LGM. (SLD)
Descriptors: Drug Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, High Schools
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3